Questions and Answers: Artificial Nutrition and Hydration and End of Life Decision Making
Are there side effects from artificial nutrition and hydration?
Yes. A number of side effects may occur, especially with the long-term use
of artificial nutrition and hydration. Tubes can damage and erode the lining of
the nasal passage, esophagus, stomach, or intestine. If tube placement requires
surgery, complications such as infection or bleeding may arise. Intravenous
lines can become uncomfortable if the insertion site becomes infected or if
fluid leaks into the skin causing inflammation or infection. Intravenous fluids
must be given with extra care to frail patients in order to avoid fluid
overload and serious breathing difficulties. TPN requires particular skill and
care to ensure that dangerous infections do not enter the blood stream.
Many patients receiving artificial nutrition and hydration by NG or G-tube
have brain disease and are unable to report that they feel full or unwell, so
abdominal bloating, cramps, or diarrhea may occur. Regurgitation is common, and
the feed (the nutritional substance inserted through the tube) may be inhaled
into the lungs causing pneumonia.
This information is provided as a resource and does not constitute an endorsement for any group. It is the responsibility of the reader to decide whether a group is appropriate for his/her needs. For evidence-based information on diseases, conditions, symptoms, treatment and wellness issues, continue searching this site.
With careful attention by healthcare providers, many side effects can be
avoided or managed fairly well. However, confused patients also can become
anxious over a tube's presence and try to pull it out. This often leads to the
use of restraints - tying the patient's arms down - or to sedation, which can
have a serious effect on patients' mental state and their ability to interact
or to perform any small activities they might be capable of such as changing
position in bed.
Is artificial nutrition and hydration different from ordinary eating and drinking?
Yes, an obvious difference is that providing artificial nutrition and
hydration requires technical skill. Professional skill and training are
necessary to insert the tube and to make decisions about how much and what type
of feed to give. Skilled management is also required to limit bad side
Other important differences exist. Artificial nutrition and hydration does
not offer the sensory rewards and comforts that come from the taste and texture
of food and liquids. Doctors and nurses, rather than patients themselves,
control when and how much will be "eaten." Finally, the social
interaction that often accompanies eating and drinking is not present.
For patients at the end of life, providing artificial nutrition and
hydration may prolong the dying process without contributing to the patient's
comfort. In fact, because of side effects, artificial nutrition and hydration
may actually contribute to the dying patient's discomfort.
To some, these differences do not matter because the provision of any type
of nourishment and fluids to a sick person is considered an important act of
caring that overrides any differences between artificially supplied nutrition
and hydration and the provision of ordinary food and water. To others, however,
artificial nutrition and hydration is a medical treatment that is vastly
different from ordinary eating and drinking. Because people can have such
different views about artificial nutrition and hydration, it is important that
individuals let others know their views.
WebMD Medical Reference from the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization