My Kid Is Drug-Free
Mandatory drug tests.
Aug. 18 -- Like any other junior high student in the dusty Texas farming
community of Lockney, Brady Tannahill has studied the Bill of Rights in school.
But unlike most, the 12-year-old is going to court to defend it.
Last December, the Lockney Independent School District announced a new
strategy in its war against drugs in the schools: Starting in February 2000,
every junior and senior high school student would have to submit to drug
The district sent home a release form for all parents to sign, authorizing
school officials to test their children. But when Brady's father, Larry,
received it, he did something unexpected: He just said no.
"I believe in my son," says Tannahill. "My wife and I have no
reason to suspect he takes drugs. The school system has no reason to suspect he
takes drugs. I say, given those facts, that there is no reason for him to be
tested for drugs."
Brady agrees. He doesn't think his school has a problem with drugs and
doesn't know any kids in his class that take them. "I just don't think it's
right that I have to be tested," he says.
The district responded to the Tannahills' refusal by threatening to suspend
Brady from school. Then, in what's shaping up as the civics lesson of a
lifetime, Brady and his father, with the help of the American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU), filed suit against the district in federal court in Lubbock,
claiming the mandatory drug testing policy violates Brady's Fourth Amendment
The high-stakes legal battle that's emerging could affect students' rights
not only in tiny Lockney, but all across the country. It has turned a father
and son into national news makers. But it's also made them hometown pariahs,
spurned by many in the community.
In March, about 700 people -- nearly a third of the town's population --
turned out for a school board meeting where the elder Tannahill was to speak
against the district's plan. Many wore T-shirts that read, "The LISD Drug
Policy -- We Appreciate It."
During the meeting the audience erupted in loud ovations for adult and
student speakers supporting the policy. Tannahill spoke to dead silence and got
no applause or support.
The next day, Tannahill's employer at the Floyd County Farm and Ranch Supply
told him he had missed too much work and his services were no longer needed.
His boss, Lindan Morris, told reporters that his firing was unrelated to the
controversy, but Morris later told a Texas newspaper, The Plainview Daily
Herald, that some customers had stopped coming in because they didn't want
to see Tannahill.
Tannahill has also lost some friends and even received threats. Last March,
his dog, a boxer, was sprayed orange with a paint gun. A note left at his home
said, "Next time it won't be your dog."