Skip to content

Arthritis Health Center

Font Size

When Did Merck Know Vioxx Was Deadly?

Study Finds Danger Signal in Early Merck Data; Merck Says Study Flawed

continued...

Ross defends his team's methods as the best way to look for a safety signal. He notes, for example, that if a patient on Vioxx died due to an accident, it may very well have been a heart attack that led to the accident. And he points to the fact that the heart/stroke risk of Vioxx is now a widely accepted medical fact -- and that Merck's studies failed to detect this risk until some 20 million people had taken the drug.

Ross says the real message of the study is not to point fingers at Merck. The point, he says, is that routine safety evaluations -- using all clinical data, not just published data -- should be performed on all new drugs.

"What we are saying is this kind of study should be done routinely, particularly when there is a known safety concern about a drug," Ross says. "This safety monitoring is not rocket science. We would be protecting the publics' health because we would be identifying risks earlier."

Federal law enacted since the Vioxx debacle now requires companies to disclose clinical trial data to the public within 12 to 24 months of study completion.

In late September, Merck settled more than 3,000 Vioxx lawsuits in a $4.85 billion settlement. That reversed a company policy of fighting each lawsuit one at a time, even though the company has won most of these suits.

1|2

Today on WebMD

Mature woman exercise at home
Hint: Warming up first is crucial.
feet with gout
Quiz yourself.
 
woman in pain
One idea? Eat fish to curb inflammation.
senior couple walking
Can you keep your RA from progressing?
 
xray of knees with osteoarthritis
Slideshow
close up of man wearing dress shoes
Slideshow
 
feet with gout
Quiz
close up of red shoe in shoebox
Slideshow
 
salad
Video
two male hands
ARTICLE
 
Woman massaging her neck
Quiz
5 Lupus Risk Factors
Article