Expectant Moms, Can the Fish
Want to chat with other expectant mothers? Check out our Already Pregnant message board. continued...
The groups report was based on nearly 60,000 mercury tests on fish from a range of government agencies. And they used a tougher mercury safety standard than the one the FDA deems acceptable. They also claimed that the FDA's January bulletin recommendations to women were based on mercury levels measured in 1979, even though the toxin has since become more widespread.
According to the report, the FDA's mercury standards are designed to protect an average adult -- not a pregnant woman or her baby. Last month, the CDC reported that 10% of women of childbearing age already had high mercury levels. The report also complained that the FDA doesn't require seafood companies to test for mercury in fish.
In January, the General Accounting Office criticized the laxness of the FDA's seafood safety program.
But the National Food Processor Association says the new mercury report is a bit of a fish story.
In a statement today, the group said that the FDA was "a more credible source of advice and information on health and safety issues." It claimed that many health experts "worry that Americans do not eat enough seafood and have expressed concern that mercury 'warnings' might frighten people away from fish that can be an important part of a healthful diet."