Breast Implants Back on the Front Pages
Jan. 24, 2000 (Washington) -- A new chapter in the ongoing saga of breast implant safety is about to unfold as an expert advisory committee to the FDA will meet in March to discuss the best ways to study the long-term effects of implants.
Underlying the meeting are very clear indications that the FDA is in favor of approving saline-filled breast implants -- products that, while available for a quarter of a century, have never been formally approved by the agency. A decision whether to formally approve silicone-gel implants, which are much more controversial than saline-filled implants, will come later, but all indications are that FDA is favorably disposed to approving them as well.
The public meeting is likely to stimulate media stories about the safety of breast implants, a controversial subject in the last decade due to mass litigation by women who claim to have been harmed from them. Hopefully, the media will cover the story factually, since poor coverage in the early 1990s led many in the public to believe that FDA had found the implants unsafe. In fact, the agency's position was that there was insufficient scientific data to reach any conclusion.
The FDA's task over the next several months is to make sense out of the scientific information about breast implants -- recognizing that the products remain the subject of confusion and emotionalism -- and to make statements that clarify rather than frighten.
A recent letter sent by the FDA to a member of Congress made clear that the agency feels there is a need not only for saline-filled implants, but also for silicone gel-filled implants, at least for reconstruction following breast cancer surgery. "Saline-filled breast implants and new breast surgical techniques are not adequate for all women," the letter stated. "There continues to be a public health need for silicone gel-filled breast implants." The letter was sent to Rep. Thomas Bliley, R-Va., the chairman of the Commerce Committee, which oversees FDA activities.
Further evidence of the agency's views came in a December meeting with women's advocacy groups to discuss how best to inform potential patients about the risks associated with implants. The major topic of discussion was not whether to have breast implants available but rather how to warn women of potential negative effects. The women's groups feel that if implants are approved, women must be notified of their risks in graphic terms, including photos of women whose implants have failed.