New Early Clue to Autism
Autism Possible in at-Risk 1-Year-Olds That Don't Respond to Their Names
April 2, 2007 -- Babies that don't respond to their names by age 1 likely
have a developmental abnormality -- perhaps even autism, a MIND Institute study
"Failure to respond to name at the well-child 1-year checkup may be a
useful indicator of children who would benefit from a more thorough
developmental assessment," suggest Aparna S. Nadig, PhD, of the University
of California Davis MIND Institute in Sacramento, and colleagues.
Even so, not all of these children will fail to develop normally. And just
because a 1-year-old can respond to his or her name doesn't mean that child
won't develop autism.
But the study marks a big step forward as researchers look for ways to
identify autism -- in all its many forms -- as early as possible. That goal has
become vastly more important in recent years. Researchers have found that
autism can be far less severe in kids who get early treatment, says Geraldine
Dawson, PhD, director of the Autism Center at the University of Washington in
"The really exciting thing is that by beginning early we are able to
prevent the full-blown autism syndrome," Dawson tells WebMD. "If we can
work with a baby at the time those brain systems are developing, we think they
will be much more responsive to treatment."
The Nadig study and Dawson's editorial appear in autism-themed April 2007
issue of Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
Babies at Risk of Autism
Nadig and colleagues studied 55 6-month-olds and 101 1-year-olds considered
"at risk" of autism because they had an older brother or sister already
diagnosed with autism. They also studied 43 6-month-olds and 46 1-year-olds not
at risk of autism as a control group.
They gave the babies a simple test. The child sat at a table, either in a
baby seat or in its mother's lap. As the baby played with a toy, a researcher
stood behind the child and called its name in a normal voice. If the child did
not stop playing with the toy and turn to make eye contact with the stranger,
the researcher called the child's name again. Each child got three chances to
At age 6 months, 82% of the babies in the control group responded to their
names on the first or second call. By age 1 year, all of these kids responded
to their names on the first or second call.
It was a different story for the at-risk kids. At age 6 months, only 66% of
the kids responded to their name on the first or second try. And at age 1 year,
only 86% of the at-risk kids responded on the first or second call.
Can this really mean anything? At age 2, developmental problems appeared in
three out of four kids who had failed the name test at age 1.