Find Information About:

Drugs & Supplements

Get information and reviews on prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, vitamins, and supplements. Search by name or medical condition.

Pill Identifier

Pill Identifier

Having trouble identifying your pills?

Enter the shape, color, or imprint of your prescription or OTC drug. Our pill identification tool will display pictures that you can compare to your pill.

Get Started

My Medicine

Save your medicine, check interactions, sign up for FDA alerts, create family profiles and more.

Get Started

WebMD Health Experts and Community

Talk to health experts and other people like you in WebMD's Communities. It's a safe forum where you can create or participate in support groups and discussions about health topics that interest you.

  • Second Opinion

    Second Opinion

    Read expert perspectives on popular health topics.

  • Community


    Connect with people like you, and get expert guidance on living a healthy life.

Got a health question? Get answers provided by leading organizations, doctors, and experts.

Get Answers

Sign up to receive WebMD's award-winning content delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up

Autism Spectrum Disorders Health Center

Font Size

BMJ Editor: MMR-Autism Study Was a Fraud

Editor in Chief of BMJ Says 1998 Study Was Deliberately Fabricated, not Just Bad Science
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD

Jan. 6, 2011 -- The journal BMJ has called the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the MMR vaccine and autism “an elaborate fraud.”

WebMD talked to Fiona Godlee, MD, BMJ editor in chief, about her journal’s expose of the flawed study by Andrew Wakefield, MD.

Why publish this now, when it looked like the MMR scare was closed when the Lancet retracted the article and Wakefield lost his license?

[Journalist Brian Deer’s] realization that the paper was a fraud had grown over time, and it was certainly news to me.

So it seemed to me a very important revelation that the paper was a deliberate fraud rather than simply a rather badly done case series.

There seemed to me to be quite important aspects of this whole story that had not yet been widely seen and understood.

Do you think there’s more bad research out there?

I’m in no doubt at all that there’s a lot of bad science. There are people who feel it’s got so bad that one can’t really trust anything that’s in medical journals. I’m not really at that level. I think there’s some good science around, too. Telling the difference is what’s hard. There’s also the difference between bad science and fraud. I think there’s a great deal more bad science out there than there is fraud.

My instincts tell me that fraud on this scale in terms of the deliberate nature of it is probably quite rare, but there are lots of smaller misdemeanors and a lot of frank error that it is floating about in the literature and being repeated, incorporated into evidence and guidelines.

There’s the pharmaceutical industry, which we know is extremely adept at manipulating its information to get the result it wants.

Vast amounts of literature I think are extremely badly flawed.

Since Wakefield was called out, have you and other editors had to up your game?

However much journal editors up their game, I think fraud is always going to be extremely hard to detect. In other cases, frauds have been detected sooner, so I think this is unusual in having survived in the glare of full publicity for so long without being detected.

Today on WebMD

girl at window
Symptoms within the first 2 years of a child’s life.
boy playing a violin
How is this condition similar to autism?
Mother and daughter indoors playing
Play therapy may undo the disorder in at-risk babies.
preschool age girl sitting at desk
What causes this rare form of autism?
High Functioning Autism And Asperge Syndrome
Gluten Free Diet Slideshow
Mother and daughter indoors playing
man on bicycle
girl at window
Mother hugging teenage son
Understanding Rett Syndrome
Home Care Tips

WebMD Special Sections