Age Bias May Hinder Breast Cancer Care
Screening, Treatment Often Less Aggressive in Older Women With Breast Cancer
WebMD News Archive
Jan. 17, 2006 -- Older women receive less aggressive screening and treatment for breast cancer than younger women, and they may be less likely to survive the disease as a result, new research from Sweden shows.
Women included in the study who were between the ages of 70 and 84 at diagnosis were up to 13% less likely to survive their breast cancer than women between the ages of 50 and 69.
The older women had mammography screening less often and their breast cancers tended to be diagnosed at a later stage. Once diagnosed, the older women also tended to get less aggressive treatment.
The findings are reported in the March 2006 issue of the journal PLoS Medicine.
"This is a very distressing finding, since around 30% of all breast cancer patients are above the age of 70," University of Uppsala epidemiologist Sonja Eaker and colleagues write.
The researchers examined diagnostic, staging, treatment, and five-year survival data for 9,060 Swedish women diagnosed with breast cancer between the ages of 50 and 84.
Eaker tells WebMD that she was not surprised to find that the older a woman was, the lower the probability that her cancer would have been detected by mammography screening. That is because in Sweden most women do not have mammograms after age 74. In many areas of the country, the cutoff is age 70, she says.
Cancer staging once the cancer was diagnosed was also less complete for the women who were age 70 and older, and treatment was less aggressive. The women tended to have fewer lymph nodes examined for cancer spread, and they were treated with radiation and chemotherapy less often, even though their tumors tended to be larger.
"It does appear that a significant age-related bias does exist," Eaker says.
70s Are Peak Age
This bias is likely to be more pronounced in the United States and other industrialized countries, says McGill University professor of epidemiology Eduardo Franco, PhD. That is because Sweden has one of the most comprehensive public health care systems in the world, and ability to pay does not influence access to care.