Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Breast Cancer Health Center

Font Size

Breast Cancer: Are Yearly Mammograms Worthwhile?

By
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

Nov. 21, 2012 -- Women over age 40 are often urged to get yearly mammograms with the promise that early detection is their best hope for beating breast cancer.

But a new study published in The New England Journal of Medicine suggests that mammograms may not save as many lives as doctors once thought.

The study also finds that the tests may be responsible for substantial harm, causing an estimated 1.3 million women in the U.S. over the last 30 years to be treated for breast cancers that would not have caused clinical symptoms.

“There’s a definite harm potential. It’s sizeable. It’s greater than we realized,” says researcher Archie Bleyer, MD, clinical research professor of radiation medicine at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland.

Bleyer says the study suggests that while mammograms are good and save lives, they should be used less often.

He supports guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that delay screening for most women until age 50 and only recommend tests every other year until age 75.

Other organizations, including the American Cancer Society and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, say women should get annual mammograms starting at age 40.

Len Lichtenfeld, MD, deputy chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, says the study is interesting and will lead to more discussion about mammograms.

“It’s not a study that’s going to close the book, shall we say, on the discussion regarding the value of mammography,” says Lichtenfeld, who was not involved in the research.

Estimating Overdiagnosis of Breast Cancer

The study looked at trends in breast cancer detection in the U.S. from 1976 through 2008.

Researchers compared rates of breast cancer diagnoses before and after mammograms became widely used for screening. They adjusted their results to remove excess cancers thought to be related to the widespread use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

Mammograms did help find more early-stage breast cancers. But finding those cancers did not seem to prevent much late-stage disease. The number of late-stage breast cancers, which are most likely to be life-threatening, dropped only slightly, from 102 to 94 cases per 100,000 women.

Researchers think that means that many early breast cancers -- perhaps as many as half of all cancers detected by mammograms -- are probably harmless and are being “overdiagnosed.”

Overdiagnosis is “the diagnosis of nothing, or something that is nothing,” says Bleyer.

“Whatever is found would never have created a problem during that person’s life. They wouldn’t have known about it otherwise,” he says.

The problem is that doctors can’t tell which early cancers may be harmless and which may become life-threatening. So once the call is made, patients are offered treatment including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.

“If we had a way to better distinguish within that diagnosis which cancers were likely to cause a problem, we would save a lot of women from unnecessary treatment,” says Sharon Giordano, MD. Giordano is a breast medical oncologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. She was not involved in the research.

Today on WebMD

Breast Cancer Overview
From self-exams and biopsies to reconstruction, we’ve got you covered.
Dealing with breast cancer
Get answers to your questions.
 
woman having mammogram
Experts don’t agree on all fronts, but you can be your own advocate.
woman undergoing breast cancer test
Many women worry. But the truth? Most abnormalities aren’t breast cancer.
 
Breast Cancer Treatments Improving
VIDEO
Resolved To Quit Smoking
SLIDESHOW
 
Woman getting mammogram
Article
Screening Tests for Women
SLIDESHOW
 
ovarian cancer overview slideshow
SLIDESHOW
serious woman
Article
 
what is your cancer risk
HEALTH CHECK
10 Ways to Revitalize Slideshow
SLIDESHOW