Skip to content

    Cervical Cancer Health Center

    Font Size

    Cervical Cancer Screening (PDQ®): Screening - Health Professional Information [NCI] - Description of the Evidence


    The evidence is also mixed about whether liquid-based techniques improve rates of test adequacy.[32,33] One advantage of liquid-based cytology is that HPV testing can be done on the same preparation; one disadvantage is that liquid-based approaches are more expensive than conventional Pap testing. No study has examined whether liquid-based cytology actually reduces the number of women dying of cervical cancer compared with conventional Pap testing.

    Screening Women Who Have Had a Hysterectomy

    Women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix for benign disease rarely have important abnormalities found on Pap testing. Several studies have shown that the rate of high-grade vaginal lesions or vaginal cancer is less than 1 in 1,000 tests;[35,36] no study has shown that screening for vaginal cancer reduces mortality from this rare condition.

    Screening Interval

    Because cervical cancer is slow growing, considerable uncertainty surrounds the issue of the optimal screening interval. The most direct evidence about this issue comes from a prospective cohort analysis of a randomized controlled trial.[37] Among 2,561 women (mean age 66.7 years) with normal Pap tests at baseline, 110 had an abnormal Pap test within the next 2 years. No woman was found to have CIN 2-3 or invasive cancer, and only one had CIN 1-2. Thus the positive-predictive value (PPV) of screening 1 year after a negative Pap test was 0%; after 2 years, the PPV was 0.9%. The authors concluded that Pap tests should not be repeated within 2 years of a negative test. A large (n = 332,000) prospective cohort study of cervical cytology and HPV DNA co-testing in U.S. women aged 30 years and older found that a negative Pap smear was associated with a low risk for developing CIN 3 or cancer (CIN 3+) for up to 5 years after the test (cumulative incidence of CIN 3+ at 3 and 5 years was 0.17% and 0.36%, respectively).[38]

    A large study that included data from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program together with modeling found little further mortality reduction from cervical cancer for screening every year as compared with screening every 3 years.[39] A similar modeling study from Australia found no differences between every 2 year and every 3 year screening.[40]

    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
    Next Article:

    Today on WebMD

    cancer cell
    HPV is the top cause. Find out more.
    doctor and patient
    Get to know the symptoms.
    sauteed cherry tomatoes
    Fight cancer one plate at a time.
    Lung cancer xray
    See it in pictures, plus read the facts.
    Integrative Medicine Cancer Quiz
    Lifestyle Tips for Depression Slideshow
    Screening Tests for Women
    what is your cancer risk