Skip to content

Leukemia & Lymphoma

Font Size
A
A
A

Newer Drugs Beat Gleevec for Leukemia

Sprycel, Tasigna May Become Options to Treat Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
By
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD

June 8, 2010 (Chicago) -- Two newer drugs, Sprycel and Tasigna, beat out the groundbreaking cancer drug Gleevec in treating people with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), researchers report.

In separate studies, both newer drugs were associated with substantially better response rates compared with the older Gleevec.

Sprycel and Tasigna are currently approved to treat patients for whom Gleevec fails.

The new findings, presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago and published online June 5 in the New England Journal of Medicine, suggest they should be considered as first-line treatment.

When Gleevec came on the market in 2001, it was considered revolutionary -- one of the first targeted therapies to seek out and destroy only cancer cells, leaving surrounding healthy tissue unscathed. Not only do such targeted therapies typically work better, but they help to avoid many of the side effects, such as nausea and hair loss, associated with traditional chemotherapy.

Overnight, the pill became the standard treatment for CML because it was relatively safe, easy to administer, and worked fast to produce excellent clinical remissions, says Sonali Smith, MD, of the University of Chicago Medical Center.

Studies have shown at least 80% of patients on Gleevec are still alive eight to 10 years after starting treatment. In contrast, the long-term survival rate was less than 20% in the pre-Gleevec era.

Gleevec targets a mutation in the protein BCR-ABL, which allows cells to multiply unchecked. Sprycel and Tasigna block the same pathway, but in slightly different and more potent ways, says Smith, who moderated a news briefing on the Sprycel findings.

Sprycel vs. Gleevec

The first study involved 519 patients with newly diagnosed CML randomly assigned to take either Sprycel or Gleevec.

After one year, cancer cells were almost completely wiped out in the bone marrow of 77% of patients receiving Sprycel, compared with 66% of patients receiving Gleevec.

Also, 46% of patients on Sprycel had a major molecular response, meaning that the amount of BCR-ABL in their blood was barely detectable, vs. 28% on Gleevec.

Patients on Sprycel responded more quickly, says Hagop Kantarjian, MD, an oncologist at University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston who worked on both studies.

1 | 2 | 3

Today on WebMD

stem cells
What are they and why do we need them?
Lung cancer xray
See it in pictures, plus read the facts.
 
sauteed cherry tomatoes
Fight cancer one plate at a time.
Ovarian cancer illustration
Do you know the symptoms?
 
Vitamin D
SLIDESHOW
New Treatments For Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
FEATURE
 
Lifestyle Tips for Depression Slideshow
SLIDESHOW
Pets Improve Your Health
SLIDESHOW