Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Cancer Health Center

Font Size

Newer Drugs Beat Gleevec for Leukemia

Sprycel, Tasigna May Become Options to Treat Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
By
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD

June 8, 2010 (Chicago) -- Two newer drugs, Sprycel and Tasigna, beat out the groundbreaking cancer drug Gleevec in treating people with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), researchers report.

In separate studies, both newer drugs were associated with substantially better response rates compared with the older Gleevec.

Sprycel and Tasigna are currently approved to treat patients for whom Gleevec fails.

The new findings, presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago and published online June 5 in the New England Journal of Medicine, suggest they should be considered as first-line treatment.

When Gleevec came on the market in 2001, it was considered revolutionary -- one of the first targeted therapies to seek out and destroy only cancer cells, leaving surrounding healthy tissue unscathed. Not only do such targeted therapies typically work better, but they help to avoid many of the side effects, such as nausea and hair loss, associated with traditional chemotherapy.

Overnight, the pill became the standard treatment for CML because it was relatively safe, easy to administer, and worked fast to produce excellent clinical remissions, says Sonali Smith, MD, of the University of Chicago Medical Center.

Studies have shown at least 80% of patients on Gleevec are still alive eight to 10 years after starting treatment. In contrast, the long-term survival rate was less than 20% in the pre-Gleevec era.

Gleevec targets a mutation in the protein BCR-ABL, which allows cells to multiply unchecked. Sprycel and Tasigna block the same pathway, but in slightly different and more potent ways, says Smith, who moderated a news briefing on the Sprycel findings.

Sprycel vs. Gleevec

The first study involved 519 patients with newly diagnosed CML randomly assigned to take either Sprycel or Gleevec.

After one year, cancer cells were almost completely wiped out in the bone marrow of 77% of patients receiving Sprycel, compared with 66% of patients receiving Gleevec. 

Also, 46% of patients on Sprycel had a major molecular response, meaning that the amount of BCR-ABL in their blood was barely detectable, vs. 28% on Gleevec.

Patients on Sprycel responded more quickly, says Hagop Kantarjian, MD, an oncologist at University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston who worked on both studies.

A total of 1.9% of patients on Sprycel and 3.5% of patients on Gleevec progressed to more aggressive states of CML known as accelerated or blast phases, in which leukemia cells build up and become more abnormal, causing symptoms to appear or become more serious.

While it's too soon to know if the drug extends lives, the improved responses in the Sprycel group suggest "it will significantly improve the long-term outcome" of CML patients, Kantarjian tells WebMD. The patients continue to be followed.

Kantarjian consults for Sprycel maker Bristol-Myers Squibb, which funded this study, as well as Novartis Pharmaceuticals, which makes Tasigna and Gleevec and funded the second study.

Today on WebMD

Colorectal cancer cells
A common one in both men and women.
Lung cancer xray
See it in pictures, plus read the facts.
 
sauteed cherry tomatoes
Fight cancer one plate at a time.
Ovarian cancer illustration
Do you know the symptoms?
 
Jennifer Goodman Linn self-portrait
Blog
what is your cancer risk
HEALTH CHECK
 
colorectal cancer treatment advances
Video
breast cancer overview slideshow
SLIDESHOW
 
prostate cancer overview
SLIDESHOW
lung cancer overview slideshow
SLIDESHOW
 
ovarian cancer overview slideshow
SLIDESHOW
Actor Michael Douglas
Article