Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Cancer Health Center

Font Size
A
A
A

Human�/�Clinical Studies

(continued)

continued...

Table 3. Clinical Studies of Acupuncture: Nausea and Vomitinga

CT = controlled trial; EA = electroacupuncture; No. = number; N/V = nausea and vomiting; RCT = randomized controlled trial.
a See text and the NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms for additional information and definition of terms.
b Number of patients treated plus number of patient controls may not equal number of patients enrolled; number of patients enrolled equals number of patients initially considered by the researcher who conducted a study; number of patients treated equals number of enrolled patients who were given the treatment being studied AND for whom results were reported; historical control subjects are not included in number of patients enrolled.
c Strongest evidence reported that the treatment under study has activity or improves the well-being of cancer patients.
d Concurrent therapy for symptoms treated (not cancer).
e For information about levels of evidence analysis and an explanation of the level of evidence scores, see Levels of Evidence for Human Studies of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
fP < .001, low-frequency EA at classical antiemetic acupuncture points daily versus minimal needling at control points with sham EA versus no adjunct needling.
gP < .001, EA versus sham EA.
hP < .001, surface electrodes versus rubber electrodes.
iP < .00059.
jP < .02, acupressure versus acupressure at a sham point.
kP < .05, acupuncture versus noninvasive placebo acupuncture.
lP < .05, acupressure and acustimulation wrist bands versus no treatment.
Reference Citation(s) Type of Study Condition Treated No. of Patients: Enrolled; Treated; Controlb Strongest Benefit Reportedc Concurrent Therapyd Level of Evidence Scoree
[25] RCT N/V related to high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer 104; 37; 67 (sham EA or no EA) Less N/V in EA groupf Yes (prochlorperazine, lorazepam, and diphenhydramine) 1iiC
[23,29,30] RCT N/V from chemotherapy 10; 10 EA; 10 sham EA (crossover study) Significantly less N/V than controlg Yes (metoclopramide) 1iiC
[26] RCT N/V from chemotherapy 100 (these patients were used more than once because of nature of crossover study); 27 surface electrodes; 11 rubber electrodes; 14 crossover study; 24 transcutaneous electrical stimulation 75% achieved considerable benefith Yes (metoclopramide, thiethylperazine, prochlorperazine, cyclizine, lorazepam, and steroid) 1iiC
[33] RCT N/V from chemotherapy 16 (the same 16 patients treated twice in a crossover study); 16 ondansetron plus transcutaneous electrical stimulation; 16 cross-over treatment ondansetron only Symptom-free patient days: 58.8%i Yes (ondansetron) 1iiC
[31] RCT N/V from chemotherapy 53 enrolled; 38 completed; 38 acupressure; 38 crossover to acupressure at a sham point 55% reduction in N/Vj Yes (antiemetics) 1iiC
[35] RCT N/V from high-dose chemotherapy 80; 41 acupuncture; 39 noninvasive placebo acupuncture Nonek Yes (ondansetron) 1iiC
[34] RCT N/V from chemotherapy 739; 233 bilateral acupressure bands and 234 transcutaneous electrical stimulation bands; 233 no bands; 39 not evaluable Less N/V in treatment groups than in controll Yes (5-HT3 receptor antagonist, prochlorperazine, and/or others) 1iiC
[36] RCT N/V from chemotherapy 142; 48 acupuncture + vitamin B6 PC6 point injection; 46 vitamin B6; 48 acupuncture Fewer emesis episodes Yes (diazepam, diphenhydramine, cimetidine, and granisetron) 1iiC
[39] RCT N/V from chemotherapy 36; 17 acupressure; 19 control Significantly lower N/V Yes (antiemetics) 1iiC
[24] Nonrandomized controlled trial N/V from chemotherapy 105; EA at P6 63%, complete relief, at least 8 h Yes (metoclopramide; prednisolone) 2C
[27,29] Consecutive case study N/V from chemotherapy 40; 40 acupressure 8-24 h relief Yes (not specified) 3iiC
[24] CT N/V from chemotherapy 43; 38 10 Hz EA; 5 sham (crossover subset) 8-10 h relief; 32 patients had complete relief Yes (antiemetics) 2C
[32] CT N/V from chemotherapy 18; 18 acupressure bands; 18 (crossover study-incorrect placement of acupressure bands) Effective for N/V Yes (antiemetics: prochlorperazine, maxalon, and domperidone suppository) 2C
[28] Nonconsecutive case series N/V from chemotherapy 26; 26 acupuncture; 51 historical controls-no acupuncture Mean no. of episodes and duration of N/V reduced Yes (metoclopramide,dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine) 3iiiC
[23] Nonconsecutive case series (pilot study) N/V from chemotherapy 15; 15 EA; none 12 patients-no symptoms for 8 h Yes (antiemetic: metoclopramide) 3iiiC
[40] Consecutive, uncontrolled case series N/V from chemotherapy mean no. of emesis 7-3 27; no controls 10 patients had complete response to EA and had no vomiting Yes (antiemetics: either ondansetron 8 mg or granisetron 3 mg) 3iiiC
[37] RCT N/V from moderate to highly emetogenic chemotherapy 160; 96; 54 Decreased delayed N/V for acupressure Yes (anthracycline, cyclophosphamide, and an antiemetic) 1iiC
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10

WebMD Public Information from the National Cancer Institute

Last Updated: May 16, 2012
This information is not intended to replace the advice of a doctor. Healthwise disclaims any liability for the decisions you make based on this information.

Today in Cancer

Building a Support System
Blog
cancer fighting foods
SLIDESHOW
 
precancerous lesions slideshow
SLIDESHOW
quit smoking tips
SLIDESHOW
 
Jennifer Goodman Linn self-portrait
Blog
what is your cancer risk
HEALTH CHECK
 
colorectal cancer treatment advances
Video
breast cancer overview slideshow
SLIDESHOW
 
prostate cancer overview
SLIDESHOW
lung cancer overview slideshow
SLIDESHOW
 
ovarian cancer overview slideshow
SLIDESHOW
life after a brain tumor
VIDEO