Does Gargling With Water Prevent Colds?
Study Says Yes, but Some Infectious Disease Experts Are Skeptical
Oct. 19, 2005 -- Can something as simple as gargling with water help keep you from catching a cold? Japanese researchers say yes, but a U.S. expert tells WebMD that the idea sounds all wet.
In a newly published study, people who gargled every day with water had fewer colds than those who didn't gargle or those who gargled with an antiseptic mouth rinse containing iodine.
Iodine mouthwashes are popular in Japan due to the common belief that they protect against colds and flu.
The iodine rinse was not found to be protective in the new study. But gargling with water was.
The researchers found that people who gargled with water several times a day were more than one-third less likely to catch a cold.
"This study suggests that simple water gargling is effective to prevent upper respiratory tract infections among healthy people," Kyoto University public health researcher Kazunari Satomura, MD, and colleagues wrote.
But infectious disease specialist Aaron Glatt, MD, says the study falls far short of convincing him that gargling with water is an effective weapon against the spread of the common cold.
Glatt is a spokesman for the Infectious Diseases Society of America and is chief of infectious diseases at New York Medical College's Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center.
The study's researchers speculated that gargling with water might wash germs from the throat or mouth before they have time to spread. But Glatt says this idea doesn't hold water.
"It just doesn't make any sense," he tells WebMD. "If gargling with water protects against colds then why wouldn't you do the same thing every time you drink water or anything else."
Glatt says there were significant problems with the study, including the fact that all of the people enrolled knew which treatment they were getting.
"I can't believe (gargling with water) would have any benefit," he says. "I certainly wouldn't recommend it based on this study."
'Price Is Right'
Vanderbilt University professor of preventive medicine William Schaffner, MD, was also skeptical, but less critical of the study.
"My interest is certainly piqued, but these findings certainly need to be replicated," he tells WebMD. "But it would be wonderful if this easy, natural intervention really does reduce the risk of infection. And the price is certainly right."