Show ratings & reviews for

2.5 Overall Rating

Effectiveness

Ease of Use

Satisfaction

Most voted positive review

3 People found this comment helpful

I took it for bacterial induced kindey stones. It worked very well and is a fairly cheap drug.

Most voted negative review

1 People found this comment helpful

acute renal failure

Shared reviews and ratings

PMBlind | 35-44 | Male | On medication for 6 months to less than 1 year | Patient
2/11/2011
Condition: Infection From Birth due to Toxoplasma Gondii Parasite
Overall rating 1.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

I was on this medication from November 1992 - March 1993. When Diagnosed with Hydrocephalus, I was taken off this drug Immediately. Inflimation in my eyes were worse than before starting the medication also.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
p | 45-54 | Male | On medication for 1 to less than 2 years | Patient
2/4/2010
Condition: Encephalitis due to the Parasite Toxoplasma Gondii
Overall rating 3.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

Sulfadiazine oral side effects: Dry mouth, cough, tirenes. over all beneficial.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
bluegill | 55-64 | Male | On medication for 5 to less than 10 years | Patient
2/18/2009
Condition: Other
Overall rating 4.7
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

I took it for bacterial induced kindey stones. It worked very well and is a fairly cheap drug.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Anonymous | 45-54 | Female | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
9/27/2007
Condition: Inflammation of the Choroid and Retina of the Eye
Overall rating 1.3
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

acute renal failure

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON WEBMD

The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions.

Read More