June 15, 2001 (Washington) -- It's back to the future with managed care reform next week in Congress. Sparks are going to fly, and no one is sure when or how the legislation is going to settle out, although Democrats have a fresh edge.
Under the new Democratic leadership, thanks to the defection of former Republican Sen. James Jeffords (I-Vt.), the Senate will take up an open-ended debate on a question that has eluded final congressional agreement for years.
A patient protection bill almost made it to then-President Bill Clinton in 1999, but in the end, the Senate and the House could not agree on the details.
As the Senate readies to debate again, President George W. Bush already has issued a veto threat of the bill that will kick off the proceedings.
"But Democrats obviously now have the initiative," says American Enterprise Institute political scholar Norman Ornstein, PhD. "The votes are not there for Bush to get what he wants. He would have been obviously in much better shape if he had control of the agenda of the Senate."
Meanwhile, the Washington ad airwaves are filling with big-dollar blitzes from HMOs and insurers on one side, and patient and doctor groups on the other.
Any of the various "patients' bill of rights" proposals are intended to offer consumers better assurances of quality care and fair procedures in managed care plans.
Common elements in the competing packages would improve patient access to medical specialists and emergency care, ensure continuity of care, make drug formularies more flexible, and guarantee better insurer coverage of clinical trials.
But other details have bedeviled reaching any agreements in a series of recent meetings among lawmakers and the White House.
Indeed, each of the two prominent proposals before the Senate have support from both parties, but the bills differ strikingly in their allowances for consumers to sue health plans for physical injury.
"It's always been a question of where you reach a compromise on the issues of the venue for lawsuits, and the limits on suits," says Ornstein. "That compromise is still very likely to be somewhere in between the two major bills."