Skip to content

    Health Care Reform:

    Health Insurance & Affordable Care Act

    A Key Question Tackled on Third Day of the Health Care Hearings

    WebMD Health News

    Supreme Court, Day 3: Can the Mandate Be Cut Out?

    March 28, 2012 -- Wednesday morning’s arguments in the Supreme Court case on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) revolved around a seemingly hypothetical question: If the court says the individual mandate that requires individuals to obtain health insurance is illegal, what happens to the rest of the law? Should it, too, be struck down?

    The question seems less hypothetical, however, after Tuesday’s two-hour hearing on the individual mandate. Although no one can predict how the court will rule, its intense questioning around the mandate led some legal experts to say that it could very well rule against it.

    Attorney Paul Clement, representing the 26 state officials and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) in their challenge of the health care reform law, told the justices that if the individual mandate is ruled unconstitutional, “the rest of the act cannot stand.”

    “What you would end up with is a hollow shell,” Clement said. He said the court should erase the entire law and give Congress a “clean slate” for tackling health care reform.

    U.S. Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler conceded that a few of the law’s key provisions would need to go if the individual mandate is found illegal. But Kneedler argued that most of the law should remain, particularly since Americans are already benefiting from some of its reforms, such as keeping young adults on their parents’ health plans up to age 26. They would lose that coverage, he warned, if the court invalidated the entire law.

    Opponents of the health reform law have challenged it in more than two dozen federal lawsuits, and have lost most of them. Only once have they convinced a court to declare the entire law unconstitutional. That happened in the case that officials from 26 states and the NFIB filed in a district court in Pensacola, Fla. There, U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson said the mandate overstepped Congress’ constitutional authority to regulate commerce. And since Vinson viewed the mandate as “inextricably bound” to the rest of the law, he canned all of it.

    An appeals court in Atlanta also declared the mandate unconstitutional, but said the rest of the health reform law could stand. That ruling is now under review by the Supreme Court, which will settle the matter once and for all.

    Today on WebMD

    stethoscope on person's chest
    Your Marketplace choices,
    doctor
    How not to waste money on health care.
     
    man in cafe looking at computer
    Finding low-cost health insurance.
    doctor showing girl a stethoscope
    Get the facts on health insurance.
     

    Latest Health Reform News

    Loading …
    URAC: Accredited Health Web Site TRUSTe online privacy certification HONcode Seal AdChoices