Affordable Care Act: State Rules Can Boost Costs
By Julie Appleby
Fri, Oct 11 2013
Consumers shopping for coverage in new online marketplaces may scratch their heads when they come to a handful of plans in Virginia: Why do some cost more than $1,800 a month?
No, the plans do not include gold-plated hospital beds or guaranteed same-day access to doctors. Instead, those premiums reflect an add-on benefit for a type of costly surgery for obesity which makes them up to six times more expensive than plans without such coverage.
Consumers in Maryland, by contrast, could buy any policy in the marketplace - and for dramatically less than the Virginia rider plans - and be covered for bariatric surgery since that state requires all plans to pay for it. In the District of Columbia, insurers are not required to offer the surgical treatment, either as a rider or a standard benefit.
The difference between Virginia’s and Maryland’s approach reflects some of the reasons for the broad variation in prices and benefits among policies offered under the federal health law.
Debates over how much to require insurers to cover and where to draw the line have long roiled state capitols as lawmakers are lobbied to mandate coverage of specific treatments or specialists. State laws vary, with some having fewer than 20 mandates and others, like Maryland, having more than double that number.
Proponents see mandated benefit coverage as a way to protect consumers, while opponents say they drive up the cost of premiums for everyone, sometimes for questionable treatments pushed by special interests. Recent fights have included whether to require insurers to cover treatment for autism or in-vitro fertilization.
“This reflects a classic tension between trying to keep costs low and trying to do the right thing,” said Dan Mendelson with consulting firm Avalere Health. “Legislatures have to make a call on whether something is a necessary medical intervention or just something nice to have.”
’A Barrier’ To Coverage