CPR Without Mouth-to-Mouth Is Also Effective
Kaye, who reviewed the study for WebMD, agrees with Hallstrom that people
who are hesitant to perform CPR should at least do chest compressions. "If
the difference is between not doing CPR at all and doing CPR with chest
compression only, clearly I would rather see something done that, to the best
of our knowledge, appears to be good, rather than doing nothing before care
arrives, which we know is bad," Kaye says.
Kaye adds that instruction for emergency medical staff who are trained by
Regions Hospital may change based on this study. Region's dispatchers already
give CPR instruction if callers agree to do it, but they only provide direction
for standard CPR -- mouth breathing plus chest compression. "If we can show
that the easy way works as well as the hard way, then we would adjust for
that," Kaye says.
While praising the study, a spokesman for the American Heart Association
says more research is needed before the organization can embrace the concept
that anything other than standard CPR should be practiced or taught.
"We have been evaluating the different studies that have come forward,
and the final conclusion is that it is advisable to continue teaching the full
form of CPR," says Jerry Potts, PhD, director of science for the
association's emergency cardiovascular care programs. "The heart
association has been really trying to identify ways to simplify how we teach
CPR. The ultimate goal is for everyone to know CPR and be willing to do
An official with the American Red Cross was also hesitant to discuss any
practical applications of the study's findings. "We are definitely
interested and excited about it, if it is something that can save lives,"
says Connie Harvey, a health and safety expert with the Red Cross. She adds
that she is eager to see whether the findings are embraced by emergency
medicine experts, which will determine whether any changes are made to Red
Cross CPR programs and guidelines.