Find Information About:

Drugs & Supplements

Get information and reviews on prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, vitamins, and supplements. Search by name or medical condition.

Pill Identifier

Pill Identifier

Having trouble identifying your pills?

Enter the shape, color, or imprint of your prescription or OTC drug. Our pill identification tool will display pictures that you can compare to your pill.

Get Started
My Medicine

My Medicine

Save your medicine, check interactions, sign up for FDA alerts, create family profiles and more.

Get Started

WebMD Health Experts and Community

Talk to health experts and other people like you in WebMD's Communities. It's a safe forum where you can create or participate in support groups and discussions about health topics that interest you.

  • Second Opinion

    Second Opinion

    Read expert perspectives on popular health topics.

  • Community


    Connect with people like you, and get expert guidance on living a healthy life.

Got a health question? Get answers provided by leading organizations, doctors, and experts.

Get Answers

Sign up to receive WebMD's award-winning content delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up

Heart Disease Health Center

Font Size

ICDs After Heart Attacks Don't Save Lives

Implantable Heart Devices No Boon for Heart Attack Recovery
WebMD Health News

Dec. 8, 2004 -- Getting an ICD implant soon after a heart attack doesn't improve survival, a new study shows.

ICDs -- implantable cardioverter defibrillators -- work wonders for people whose hearts don't pump properly and are at risk for dangerous heart rhythms. The devices sense when the heart's regular beating rhythm starts to flutter. They then give an electric shock that restores a normal heartbeat.

The devices clearly help people with serious heart disease. Doctors hoped they'd also be able to help people whose hearts are damaged by a recent heart attack, a susceptible period for these abnormal rhythms. But that doesn't seem to be the case, report Stefan H. Hohnloser, MD, of J.W. Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, and colleagues in the Dec. 9 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.

Hohnloser and colleagues implanted ICDs in 332 patients who'd had a heart attack in the last six to 40 days. They compared them with 342 recent heart attack patients who didn't get the implanted devices. All of the patients had serious heart damage resulting in significantly reduced ability to pump blood. On average, patients enrolled in the study only 18 days after having a heart attack.

As hoped, ICDs cut abnormal heart rhythm-related deaths by 58%. But they increased the risk of death from other causes -- mostly heart failure -- by 75%.

"The main finding of [this study is] that patients who have recently had a [heart attack] do not benefit from an ICD," Hohnloser and colleagues write. "The most likely explanation is that the patients 'saved' from [an abnormal heart rhythm]-related death by ICD therapy are also at high risk from other cardiac causes."

In an editorial accompanying the Hohnloser study, Anne M. Gillis, MD, notes that ICDs are "not for everybody." Gillis, a noted heart researcher, is medical scientist for Canada's Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.

Gillis notes that ICDs implanted soon after a serious heart attack "may simply convert what would have been a sudden death to a death from [heart pumping] failure, without an effect on survival."

Today on WebMD

x-ray of human heart
A visual guide.
atrial fibrillation
Symptoms and causes.
heart rate graph
10 things to never do.
heart rate
Get the facts.
empty football helmet
red wine
eating blueberries
Simple Steps to Lower Cholesterol
Inside A Heart Attack
Omega 3 Sources
Salt Shockers
lowering blood pressure