Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Heart Disease Health Center

Font Size

Heart Attack Tests for All?

Group of Prominent Cardiologists Calls for Radical Change in Testing for Heart Risk

No Change in Official Guidelines

The SHAPE recommendations won't change official U.S. guidelines, says Diane Bild, MD, deputy director of the division of epidemiology and clinical applications at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

"What we really need for [federal] guideline recommendations is just not available yet," Bild tells WebMD. "This is a laudable effort to move preventive cardiology forward. But it occurs with a lack of the complete and clear information that we need to make guidelines.

"The tests are out there. They are being used," Bild says. "It is just not clear what the value of these tests really is -- and whether treatment should be targeted based on those tests."

Naghavi bristles at the argument that the screening tests aren't ready for prime time.

Tests Uncover Major Risks

"To those who say the technology isn't there yet, we say check with recent discoveries," Naghavi says.

"For the very first time in heart medicine, we now have a test that can show someone has up to a 65-fold increased risk of a heart attack," he says. "With the traditional risk factors, the biggest risk is high cholesterol, which has only up to 4.5-fold increased risk. So you can see how much of a jump in prediction we get from this."

But Bild says there are simply too many unanswered questions about the new screening tools.

"We always advise caution before launching a widespread screening program," she says. "We would emphasize the need for a clear look at the tests' cost effectiveness, the accuracy of the tests, the availability of the tests, and most important, what interventions should be done based on the tests. We would also be concerned about telling people they have a disease that puts them at risk without clear evidence that treatment will change their outcomes."

The Risks

Topol notes that screening has risks -- and that the tests' unproven benefit does not outweigh those risks.

"These tests just show you have a lot of cholesterol in your artery, or an artery that is narrowing," he says. "We don't know how good they are in predicting heart attacks. So you could get a test that shows a narrowing of your artery, and end up with a drug-coated stent in your artery for no reason."

Shah says the real risk is that people will continue to die of heart attacks their doctors never saw coming.

"If we wait for definitive clinical trials, we will keep losing individuals to heart attacks because they have never been screened," he says. "This is a challenge to the medical community. It does not preclude clinical trials. But in the meantime, you have to do medicine based on collective wisdom and collective knowledge.

"The bulk of evidence supports this initiative," says Shah.

Today on WebMD

cholesterol lab test report
Article
Compressed heart
Article
 
heart rate graph
Article
Compressed heart
Article
 
empty football helmet
Article
red wine
Video
 
eating blueberries
Article
Simple Steps to Lower Cholesterol
Slideshow
 
Inside A Heart Attack
SLIDESHOW
Omega 3 Sources
SLIDESHOW
 
Salt Shockers
SLIDESHOW
lowering blood pressure
SLIDESHOW