Skip to content

Heart Disease Health Center

Font Size
A
A
A

Radiation From Cardiac CT Scans Varies

Study Shows Many Centers Are Not Using Radiation-Lowering Strategies
By
WebMD Health News

Feb. 3, 2009 -- Radiation doses from scans used to diagnose heart and vascular disease vary widely, and they could be reduced significantly if strategies for minimizing exposure were more widely followed, a new study shows.

Researchers estimated radiation exposures from cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans at 50 teaching and community hospitals throughout the world. Their study appears in the Feb. 4 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association.

They found radiation exposures at the highest-dose sites to be six times as high as those at the lowest-dose sites.

And on average, the radiation exposure from a single, new-generation CT imaging test was equivalent to exposure from 600 conventional chest X-rays.

"That sounds really scary, but the chest X-ray isn't very useful for evaluating coronary artery disease so it really is a useless comparison," study researcher Jorg Hausleiter, MD, tells WebMD. "The more important point is that coronary CT is an excellent diagnostic tool for ruling out coronary artery disease. But we need to work to reduce radiation exposures."

64-Slice CT Scan

Since its introduction less than five years ago, the 64-slice CT scan had emerged as a leading tool for identifying clogged arteries and cardiovascular risk.

CT scanning in U.S. cardiology practices has increased threefold in the last two years and is expected to continue to rise.

But concerns about increases in cancer risk from increased radiation exposure remain.

"This new study highlights the fact that radiation doses from cardiac CT can still be quite high," Columbia University cardiologist Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD, tells WebMD. "That is of concern. But what we don't want is people avoiding these tests out of fear."

In a 2007 study, Einstein and colleagues concluded that the cancer risk from a single 64-slice CT heart scan was small but not negligible. The risk for women was found to be higher than for men and the risk to younger patients was higher than for older ones.

Mayo Clinic cardiologist Thomas C. Gerber, MD, PhD, who worked on the newly published study, tells WebMD that the cancer risk from diagnostic procedures like the 64-slice CT is not completely understood.

Today on WebMD

x-ray of human heart
A visual guide.
atrial fibrillation
Symptoms and causes.
 
heart rate graph
10 things to never do.
Compressed heart
Article
 
empty football helmet
Article
red wine
Video
 
eating blueberries
Article
Simple Steps to Lower Cholesterol
Slideshow
 
Inside A Heart Attack
SLIDESHOW
Omega 3 Sources
SLIDESHOW
 
Salt Shockers
SLIDESHOW
lowering blood pressure
SLIDESHOW