Skip to content

HIV & AIDS Health Center

Researchers Alarmed by Case of HIV 'Superinfection'

Font Size
A
A
A
By
WebMD Health News

Feb. 2, 2000 (San Francisco) -- The fate of a 40-year-old Canadian gay man could tell physicians a great deal about the future of the AIDS epidemic, particularly whether deadlier, drug-resistant strains of the disease might reinfect relatively healthy patients with devastating consequences. According to a case study presented here at a meeting of HIV researchers, the 40-year-old had been living with HIV since 1989 without taking anti-retroviral drugs, and then suddenly, his health began to deteriorate.

The amount of virus in his blood increased, and even a combination of anti-AIDS drugs didn't stop his decline. That made the man's physician suspicious that his patient might have been infected twice, the victim of a new 'superinfection' -- something long suspected but difficult to prove.

"Our initial plan was to look for drug resistance, not to prove that it was [a superinfection]," Jonathan Angel, MD, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Ottawa, tells WebMD. However, what Angel and his colleagues ultimately found could be the first documented case of an HIV superinfection. Luckily, a 1989 sample of the patient's blood was still in existence as a point of reference.

After determining that the person had begun a relationship with a man with advanced HIV in 1997, it was possible to compare genetic bits of the viruses in both individuals to see if they shared common elements. These genes were grown and analyzed as though the researchers were looking at different family trees. There were some striking similarities between the recent samples from the two men. However, the original 1989 sample was distinctly different.

"The genetic information suggests that there has been a transmission of one virus to the other," says Angel. On the one hand, he says, that's not surprising, because doctors assume HIV can re-infect a person in the early stages of the disease. What makes this case disturbing is that the apparent superinfection occurred years after the disease struck initially, when Angel says it's thought patients may have enough immune response to hold off another invasion from the virus.

"You could introduce a more virulent strain or a drug-resistant strain ... that was never there," says Angel. Thus, he says there is a public health message from the research. Namely, don't have sex with a previously infected person. Even if you have HIV, that's not a guarantee you couldn't get an even worse version of the disease that could wipe out the effectiveness of your current therapy. It's possible, says Angel, there could even be a "doomsday" strain that would be resistant to all therapy.

Today on WebMD

misconception
How much do you know?
contemplative man
What to do now.
 
research
Should you be tested?
HIV under microscope
What does it mean?
 
HIV AIDS Screening
Slideshow
man opening condom wrapper
Quiz
 
HIV AIDS Treatment
Feature
Discrimination Stigma
Feature
 
Treatment Side Effects
Feature
grilled chicken and vegetables
Article
 
obese man standing on scale
Article
cold sore
Article
 

WebMD Special Sections