Curbing HIV Risk Through Circumcision
Age-Old Procedure Could Avert Millions of New Infections Worldwide
WebMD News Archive
Aug. 17, 2006 (Toronto) -- A practice dating back to biblical times could
soon join the list of powerful weapons against AIDS.
New studies suggest that male
circumcisioncircumcision -- the surgical removal of the
foreskin from the penis -- could avert hundreds of thousands of new HIV
infections and save millions of dollars.
The research, presented at the International AIDS Conference here, builds on
last year's finding that circumcised heterosexual men are at least 60% less
likely to contract HIV than their uncircumcised counterparts.
Kevin De Cock, MD, director of the World Health Organization's HIV/AIDSHIV/AIDS program, says that if the findings hold
up, the global agency will issue guidelines backing the procedure for HIV
Male circumcision could avert as many as two million new infections over 10
years in sub-Saharan Africa alone, he tells WebMD.
De Cock says his agency will await the results of two more large studies,
expected to be completed next year in Kenya and Uganda, before making a
Circumcision Cuts Costs
In the meantime, early results from another, ongoing study of tea plantation
residents in rural Kenya support last year's findings.
That study, presented here this week, showed circumcised men were about
two-thirds less likely to contract HIV over a two-year period than
In yet another study, Yale University researchers projected that increasing
circumcision rates by just 10% to 20% could ward off 32,000 to 52,000
infections in Soweto, South Africa alone over the next 20 years.
Other new research suggests circumcision would be cost-effective.
And, despite worries that circumcised men would feel safe and engage in
risky behaviors, University of Illinois researchers found that half of recently
circumcised men reported using condoms more consistently and paying for sex
Obstacles to Overcome
No one's really sure how
circumcisioncircumcision might prevent infection with HIV, but
De Cock offers several possibilities.
The foreskin is covered with a much thinner layer of cells than the penis,
which could facilitate invasion by the virus, he says. Also, the foreskin has
more cells that have targets for the virus, De Cock says.