Skip to content

    HIV & AIDS Health Center

    Font Size

    Sharp Debate Over HIV Vaccine Failure

    Scientists Can't Agree on Future of HIV Research
    WebMD Health News
    Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

    March 25, 2008 -- The recent failure of the most promising HIV vaccine ever developed has scientists taking stock and wondering where to go next.

    After more than 20 years of research, answers to that question are scarce.

    "We have to admit to ourselves that we don't know how to make an HIV vaccine right now," said Beatrice H. Hahn, MD, a microbiologist at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

    Hahn spoke in front of hundreds of researchers gathered in Bethesda, Md., to try to brainstorm ideas for finding a vaccine for HIV; the virus has killed 25 million people worldwide and now infects an estimated 33 million, according the World Health Organization.

    The meeting comes several months after the drug company Merck announced it was halting human trials of its experimental HIV vaccine. Not only did the vaccine not work to prevent infection, but it also didn't reduce the amount of virus in people who became infected; there were also indications suggesting it may have made it easier for some people to contract the virus.

    The failure has researchers and policy makers locked in a debate. Some are calling for more money for testing vaccines similar to the failed Merck vaccine already in the pipeline. Others want to abandon the vaccines under testing and start from scratch.

    "Nothing currently around is going to cause significant protection, in the opinion of many of us," Hahn said. She counts herself among the leading scientists calling on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to sharply reduce support for testing existing experimental vaccines. The money should be spent instead on basic scientific research aimed at finding new approaches to a vaccine, these scientists say.

    Funding HIV Research

    NIH officials say they've been hurt by five years of flat funding from Congress. One effect of the shortfall is dwindling support for young researchers who could come up with new ideas, they say.

    "The easy things have been done," said James Hoxie, MD, who directs the Penn Center for AIDS Research at the University of Pennsylvania.

    Wednesday's meeting was part scientific strategy session, part group therapy session for a field stunned by its lack of progress.

    Today on WebMD

    How much do you know?
    contemplative man
    What to do now.
    Should you be tested?
    HIV under microscope
    What does it mean?
    HIV AIDS Screening
    man opening condom wrapper
    HIV AIDS Treatment
    Discrimination Stigma
    Treatment Side Effects
    grilled chicken and vegetables
    obese man standing on scale
    cold sore