Skip to content

    Lung Cancer Health Center

    Font Size

    Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): Treatment - Health Professional Information [NCI] - Stage IV NSCLC Treatment


    Performance status (PS)

    PS is among the most important prognostic factors for survival of patients with NSCLC.[27] The benefit of therapy for this group of patients has been evaluated through retrospective analyses as well as through prospective clinical trials.

    The results support further evaluation of chemotherapeutic approaches for both metastatic and locally advanced NSCLC; however, the efficacy of current platinum-based chemotherapy combinations is such that no specific regimen can be regarded as standard therapy. Outside of a clinical trial setting, chemotherapy should be given only to patients with good PS and evaluable tumor lesions, who desire such treatment after being fully informed of its anticipated risks and limited benefits.

    Evidence (performance status):

    1. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial (CLB-9730), which compared carboplatin and paclitaxel with single-agent paclitaxel, enrolled 99 patients with a PS of 2 (18% of the study's population).[25]
      • When compared with patients with a PS of 0 to 1, who had a median survival of 8.8 months and a 1-year survival of 38%, the corresponding figures for patients with a performance status of 2 were 3.0 months and 14%, respectively; this demonstrates the poor prognosis conferred by a lower PS. These differences were statistically significant.
      • When patients with a PS of 2 were analyzed by treatment arm, those who received combination chemotherapy had a significantly higher response rate (24% vs. 10%), longer median survival (4.7 mo vs. 2.4 mo), and superior 1-year survival (18% vs. 10%), compared with those who were treated with single-agent paclitaxel.[25]
    2. A subset analysis of 68 patients with a PS of 2 from a trial that randomly assigned more than 1,200 patients to four platinum-based regimens has been published.
      • Despite a high incidence of adverse events, including five deaths, the final analysis showed that the overall toxic effects experienced by patients with a PS of 2 was not significantly different from that experienced by patients with a PS of 0 to 1.
      • An efficacy analysis demonstrated an overall response rate of 14%, median survival time of 4.1 months, and a 1-year survival rate of 19%; all were substantially inferior to the patients with PS of 0 to 1.
    3. A phase II randomized trial (E-1599) of attenuated dosages of cisplatin plus gemcitabine and carboplatin plus paclitaxel included 102 patients with a PS of 2.[28]
      • Response rates were 25% and 16%, median survival times were 6.8 months and 6.1 months, and 1-year survival rates were 25% and 19%, respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant, but the survival figures were longer than expected on the basis of historical controls.
    4. Results from two trials suggest that patients with a PS of 2 may experience symptom improvement.[29,30]
    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
    Next Article:

    Today on WebMD

    Xray analysis
    Do you know the myths from the facts?
    chest x-ray
    Get to know them.
    woman taking pills
    Tips to managing them.
    Lung cancer xray
    See it in pictures, plus read the facts.
    Lung Cancer Risks Myths and Facts
    Woman getting ct scan
    Improving Lung Cancer Survival Targeted Therapy
    cancer fighting foods
    Lung Cancer Surprising Differences Between Sexes
    Pets Improve Your Health
    Vitamin D
    Lung Cancer Surgery Options