Skip to content

    Lung Cancer Health Center

    Font Size

    Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): Treatment - Health Professional Information [NCI] - Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment

    Table 2. Combination Chemotherapy For Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer continued...

    Evidence (duration of treatment):

    1. The optimal duration of chemotherapy is not clearly defined, but no obvious improvement in survival occurs when the duration of drug administration exceeds 6 months.[7,18,19]
    2. No clear evidence is available from reported data from randomized trials that maintenance chemotherapy will improve survival duration.[20,21,22][Level of evidence: 1iiA] However, a meta-analysis of 14 published, randomized trials assessing the benefit of duration/maintenance therapy reported an odds ratio of 0.67 for both 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.79; P < .001 for 1-year OS and 0.53-0.86; P < .001 for 2-year OS). This corresponded to an increase of 9% in 1-year OS and 4% in 2-year OS.[23][Level of evidence: 1iiA]

    Evidence (dose intensification):

    1. The role of dose intensification in patients with SCLC remains unclear.[24,25,26,27,28] Early studies showed that under-treatment compromised outcome and suggested that early dose intensification may improve survival.[24,25] A number of clinical trials have examined the use of colony-stimulating factors to support dose-intensified chemotherapy in SCLC.[26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] These studies have yielded conflicting results.
      • Four studies have shown that a modest increase in dose intensity (25%-34%) was associated with a significant improvement in survival with no compromise in quality of life (QOL).[26,27,28,29][Level of evidence: 1iiA]
      • Two of three studies that examined combinations of the variables of interval, dose per cycle, and number of cycles showed no advantage.[29,30,31,32][Level of evidence: 1iiA]
      • The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial (EORTC-08923) reported a randomized comparison of standard-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide given every 3 weeks for five cycles versus intensified treatment given at 125% of the dose every 2 weeks for four cycles with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support.[32] The median dose intensity delivered was 70% higher in the experimental arm; the median cumulative dose was similar in both arms. There was no difference between treatment groups in median or 2-year survival.
      • A randomized, phase III trial compared ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide (ICE), which was given every 4 weeks, with twice weekly ICE with G-CSF and autologous blood support.[33] Despite achieving a relative dose intensity of 1.84 in the dose-accelerated arm, there was no difference in response rate (88% vs. 80%, respectively), median survival (14.4 vs. 13.9 months, respectively), or 2-year survival (19% vs. 22%, respectively) for dose-dense treatment compared with standard treatment.[33][Level of evidence: 1iiA] Patients who received dose-dense treatment spent less time on treatment and had fewer episodes of infection.

        A randomized, phase II study of identical design reported a significantly better median survival for the dose-dense arm (29.8 vs. 17.4 months, respectively; P = .02) and 2-year survival (62% vs. 36%, respectively; P = .05).[34] However, given the small study size (only 70 patients), these results should be viewed with caution.

    1 | 2 | 3 | 4
    Next Article:

    Today on WebMD

    Xray analysis
    Do you know the myths from the facts?
    chest x-ray
    Get to know them.
    woman taking pills
    Tips to managing them.
    Lung cancer xray
    See it in pictures, plus read the facts.
    Lung Cancer Risks Myths and Facts
    Woman getting ct scan
    Improving Lung Cancer Survival Targeted Therapy
    cancer fighting foods
    Lung Cancer Surprising Differences Between Sexes
    Pets Improve Your Health
    Vitamin D
    Lung Cancer Surgery Options