Many ERs Illegally Refuse to Treat Patients, Consumer Group Says
July 12, 2001 (Washington) -- Hundreds of hospitals across the country are guilty of illegal patient "dumping," or not providing patients with proper emergency room treatment as required by law, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen charges in a new report.
In its report "Questionable Hospitals," Public Citizen's Health Research Group says that the emergency departments of more than 500 hospitals in 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico illegally denied medical screening, did not provide stabilizing treatment, or improperly transferred patients with unstabilized emergency conditions to other hospitals between 1997 and 1999.
Under the 1986 Emergency Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA, all hospitals with emergency rooms are required to provide appropriate medical treatment to every person who enters the ER seeking treatment, regardless of their ability to pay.
The report, available on Public Citizen's web site, is based on a review of confirmed violations from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government agency responsible for making sure hospitals comply with the 1986 act.
One major reason for the illegal patient dumping is financial, Public Citizen charges. This is because many patients coming to ERs have no health insurance, and even if a patient does have insurance, their managed care organization may deny or reduce reimbursement to the hospital if the person is found not to have an emergency medical condition.
So in an attempt to avoid racking up expenses that will not be recouped, hospitals either discourage patients from receiving treatment by asking for payment up front or flat out refuse to treat the patients. Both actions can be construed as illegal, and in more than one case, they have led to the death of a patient, Public Citizen says.
Hospitals violating the 1986 act can be fined, but most never are, Sidney Wolfe, MD, said at a press conference on Thursday. Wolfe is the director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group.
Of the 500 hospitals that committed finable offenses during the study period, only 85, or 17%, were fined, Wolfe noted.
But even if the hospitals are fined, the maximum penalty, which is $50,000, is not much of a deterrent, according to Wolfe. This is "barely a drop in the bucket" in the budgets of most hospitals, which can have annual budgets of up to $200 million, he said.
The hospital industry objected to the findings in the report. "This report highlights the exception, not the rule," Alicia Mitchell, spokeswoman for the American Hospital Association, tells WebMD.
Most hospitals do not violate EMTALA, she says, noting that U.S. hospitals see 100 million emergency visits a year, which results in $20 billion in uncompensated care.
Mitchell concedes that some instances of patient dumping do occur. But she insists that these are the result of "poor judgement" or a failure to document care that was actually delivered.