Time Spent in Europe Means No More Time in the Blood Donation Center
WebMD News Archive
Experts worry that the conflicting guidelines will further
confuse the public about the baffling disease.
Last year, the federal government banned blood donations from
anyone who spent a total of six months in Britain between 1980 and 1996, when
that country was the epicenter of the mad cow outbreak.
But with mad cow disease spreading throughout Europe, in
January scientific advisers to the FDA recommended banning donations from
anyone who spent a total of 10 years in Portugal, France, and Ireland since
1980. The expert panel, which included some of the nation's top mad cow
experts, concluded that these countries were of most concern but said the risk
there was lower than that in Britain.
In February, the FDA indicated it would stick closely to the
recommendations of its advisers, who argued that the Red Cross' call for
tighter restrictions went farther than necessary. The agency said then that it
was likely to impose the ban only on travelers to Portugal and France.
The Red Cross, which collects about half of the nation's blood
supply, is legally allowed to set stricter standards than required by the
government. But its blood banks may not say or imply that their blood is safer
than those collected by banks following the government standards.
Competing blood banks fear patients will perceive the Red Cross
policy as safer and thus they will have to follow suit, risking shortages by
turning away longtime donors such as military families.
Healy notes the Red Cross also has presented a plan to the FDA
to address the shortage risks that the new rules could cause.
"We have an obligation to compensate for that," Healy
says. She notes her organization has presented to the FDA its four-point plan
to bring in more blood. First, the Red Cross will promote the use of new
collection techniques that could allow double the red blood cells to be taken
from a donor. Blood surpluses, when they occur, could be frozen instead of
discarded, to prepare for lows. There are plans underway to encourage the
existing four million annual donors to give five times yearly instead of about
twice a year, and media campaigns are to be expanded to bring in new