Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up
Font Size

Prostate Cancer Screening (PDQ®): Screening - Health Professional Information [NCI] - Evidence of Benefit

Summary of First Four Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Roundsa

DRE = digital rectal exam; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; T = tumor.
a Adapted from Grubb et al.[46]
 T0 (Baseline)T1T2T3
Number Tested (PSA or DRE)34,26232,69631,69730,544
PSA positive (>4 ng/mL) (%)
DRE positive (%)
Either test positive (%)14.013.514.415.1
Biopsies and Cancers    
PSA >4 ng/mL2,7182,5022,5932,676
Cancers/1,000 screened14.
DRE abnormal and PSA ≤4 ng/mL2,0831,9231,9731,943
Cancers/1,000 screened1.
PSA >4 ng/mL or DRE abnormal4,8014,4254,5664,619
Cancers/1,000 screened16.011.510.811.1

After 7 years of follow-up, with vital status known for 98% of men, the incidence of prostate cancer per 10,000 person-years was 116 (2,820 cancers) in the screening group and 95 (2,322 cancers) in the control group (rate ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.16–1.29). The incidence of death per 10,000 person-years was 2.0 (50 deaths) in the screening group and 1.7 (44 deaths) in the control group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.75–1.70). The data at 10 years were 67% complete and consistent with these overall findings (incidence rate ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11–1.22 and mortality rate ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83–1.50). Thus, after 7 to 10 years of follow-up, the rate of death from prostate cancer was very low and did not differ significantly between the two study groups.

At 7 years, the total numbers of deaths (excluding those from prostate, lung, or colorectal cancers) were 2,544 in the screening group and 2,596 in the control group (rate ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92–1.03); at 10 years, the numbers of such deaths were 3,953 and 4,058, respectively (rate ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93–1.01). The distribution of the causes of death was similar in the two groups.

The following are several possible explanations for the lack of a reduction in mortality so far in this trial:

  • Annual screening with the PSA test using the standard U.S. threshold of 4 ng per mL and DRE to trigger diagnostic evaluation may not be effective.
  • The level of screening in the control group could have been substantial enough to dilute any modest effect of annual screening in the screening group.
  • Approximately 44% of the men in each study group had undergone one or more PSA tests at baseline, which would have eliminated some cancers detectable on screening from the randomly assigned population; thus, the cumulative death rate from prostate cancer at 10 years in the two groups combined was 25% lower in those who had undergone two or more PSA tests at baseline than in those who had not been tested.
  • Potentially, the most important explanation is that improvement in therapy for prostate cancer during the course of the trial probably resulted in fewer prostate-cancer deaths in the two study groups, which blunted any potential benefits of screening.
  • The follow-up may not be long enough for benefit from the earlier detection of an increased number of prostate cancers in the screening group to emerge.[47]
  • After a PSA finding greater than 4.0 ng/mL, within 1 year only 41% of men underwent prostate biopsy; within 3 years of this finding, only 64% of men underwent prostate biopsy. Such lower biopsy rates, associated with lower prostate cancer detection rates, may have blunted the impact of screening on mortality.[48]

WebMD Public Information from the National Cancer Institute

Last Updated: February 25, 2014
This information is not intended to replace the advice of a doctor. Healthwise disclaims any liability for the decisions you make based on this information.
Next Article:

Today on WebMD

Prostate Cancer Overview
what is your cancer risk
woman speaking with doctor
Prostate Nerve Transplant
cancer fighting foods
15 Cancer Symptoms Men Ignore
Prostate Enlarged
Picture Of The Prostate
Prostate Cancer Quiz
screening tests for men
Prostate Cancer Symptoms
Vitamin D