Experts Debate Merits of School-Based Testing for STDs
March 10, 2000 (New York) -- How would you react if your teen-ager came home from school with a note requesting permission to test him or her for a sexually transmitted disease (STD)? Would you allow it, knowing that you may not have access to the results unless your child wants you to?
The subject is controversial and troubling for many parents and their kids. However, unwanted pregnancies and rising rates of STDs like chlamydia and gonorrhea among teen-agers are forcing experts to call for a balanced debate on whether such testing should be widely available in schools, a British physician writes in Saturday's issue of The Lancet. Such tests are typically conducted in family planning clinics or health centers.
David Hicks, MD, at Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield, England, writes that many of his colleagues initially agreed with the idea of STD testing in schools, but then had questions, such as: "Would the results be given to parents?" "Who else would have access to the information?" and "Who would bear the responsibility for investigating further if sexual abuse, rape, or incest is uncovered?"
Hicks' letter was prompted by a study published in Pediatrics in December 1999 describing a three-year voluntary STD testing program for 14- to 17-year olds in Louisiana high schools. At their first test, 12% of girls and 6% of boys had chlamydia infection; 3% of girls and 1% of boys had gonorrhea. Chlamydia and gonorrhea are two of the most common and easily treated STDs in the U.S.
By the end of the program, only 3% of boys had chlamydia, which was half the rate of boys who had not participated in the program. There was a slight decline in both chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in girls.
Results of the STD tests were given to students, who were advised to share them with their parents, but sharing results with their parents was not mandatory. The same confidentiality policy is carried out at family planning and STD clinics across the country.
"We felt that if we had said that the parents would be given the results, many students would not have been tested, and therefore many infections would go unrecognized and there would be severe health consequences that could have been prevented," says Thomas A. Farley, MD, MPH, medical director of the STD/HIV Programs in the Louisiana State Office of Public Health in New Orleans and senior author of the Pediatrics study.