June 12, 2009 - Congress on Friday sent a bill to President Barack Obama
slapping new regulations on the tobacco industry and curtailing how cigarettes
can be manufactured, marketed, and sold.
The bill for the first time gives the FDA authority to regulate tobacco
products. Congress has been trying for almost a decade to grant that authority,
after the Supreme Court said in 2000 that the agency did not have the power to
regulate the cigarette industry on its own.
After more than a week of debate, the Senate approved the bill by a 79-17
vote last night.
In a statement in the White House Rose Garden Friday, President Obama said
he would sign the bill into law.
“For over a decade, leaders of both parties have fought to prevent tobacco
companies from marketing their products to children and provide the public with
the information they need to understand what a dangerous habit this is.
And after a decade of opposition, all of us are finally about to achieve the
victory with this bill, a bill that truly defines change in Washington,” Obama
The bill forces tobacco companies to seek FDA’s approval to market new
products and bars them from manipulating the level of nicotine and other
chemicals in cigarettes. The bill also:
Bars the use of terms like “lite” and “low tar.” Antismoking advocates
worry those labels suggest that the cigarettes are not as harmful, which
studies show is not the case.
Bans flavorings like fruit, candy, and spices that can appeal to children.
It does not ban menthol flavorings.
Sets new restrictions on advertising. FDA will now have the power to
regulate tobacco advertising, it’s look, distribution, and content in the
“interest of public health.”
Requires larger warnings labels on cigarette packs and in advertising.
Gives FDA the power to lower nicotine levels in cigarettes, but does not
let the government lower the level to zero.
Bans tobacco or cigarette company sponsorship of sporting or entertainment
Does NOT raise taxes on cigarettes nor ban them.
Supporters said the bill’s tough restrictions on marketing and advertising
would make it more difficult for companies to lure young people to