Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Stroke Health Center

Font Size

Stents as Good as Surgery at Preventing Stroke

Less Invasive Approach Works as Well as Gold Standard
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

Feb. 26, 2010 (San Antonio) -- A less invasive approach for clearing clogged neck arteries proved just as effective and safe as surgical treatment for preventing strokes in high-risk patients, according to the largest comparison of the two procedures.

Stenting, in which flexible mesh tubes are used to prop open blocked blood vessels, is widely used to clear plaque-clogged coronary arteries, which cause heart attacks. More recently, it has been used to open blocked neck arteries that lead to strokes, but surgery called carotid endarterectomy remains the gold standard.

The new study shows that "we now have two good options for patients," says researcher Wayne Clark, MD, of Oregon Health & Science University.

The choice may come down to the individual patient's age, health, and preferences, he tells WebMD.

The study, presented at the American Stroke Association's (ASA) International Stroke Conference, showed that in the weeks after the procedure, patients who received stents suffered slightly more strokes, and patients who underwent surgery had slightly more heart attacks.

But an average of 2.5 years later, "there was no significant difference in the number of events between the two groups," Clark says.

About 2% of patients in both groups suffered a heart attack or stroke or died -- the lowest rates of adverse events ever seen in a stroke trial pitting stenting against surgery, he says.

Interestingly, patients under age 70 appeared to benefit slightly more from stents, while older patients benefited slightly more from surgery, says lead researcher Thomas Brott, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville.

"Most of us thought the less invasive procedure would be better suited for older patients, but based on our data we have to question that," he tells WebMD.

The study was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke with supplemental funding from stent maker Abbott Vascular.

Stenting vs. Surgery: European Trial Has Conflicting Results

The findings were announced just hours after European researchers reported that stenting is inferior to surgery when it comes to preventing stroke.

Those results, published online by the journal Lancet, showed that patients who received the stents had a much higher rate of stroke, heart attack, or death than patients who underwent surgery.

The University of Miami's Ralph Sacco, MD, president-elect of the American Heart Association, tells WebMD that patient selection might explain the disparate results.

The European study enrolled only patients whose neck blockages caused symptoms such as swishing in the ears or vision problems; the North American study included patients with and without symptoms. Those with symptoms are presumably sicker and would benefit more from surgery, Sacco says.

Also, the doctors who performed the stent procedures in the North American study were more experienced, Brott says.

There were also differences in the types of stents used, Clark says. In the European trial, doctors were allowed to use any approved stent, while the North American doctors all used Abbott's Acculink Carotid Stent System.

Today on WebMD

Understanding Stroke
Lowering Blood Pressure Slideshow
most common stroke symptoms
Stroke Recovery

brain scans
woman with migraine
brain scan
quit smoking tips

Heart Foods Slideshow
Soy For High BP
BP Medicine
Lowering Cholesterol Slideshow

WebMD Special Sections