Show ratings & reviews for

3.8 Overall Rating

Effectiveness

Ease of Use

Satisfaction

Most voted positive review

1 People found this comment helpful

My IGM count went to a normal level within one month of use. I went from over 2000 to 230. I’ve had Waldenstroms with my counts going over 9000 and this has been the quickest turn around with no side effects.

Most voted negative review

1 People found this comment helpful

Disabiling

Shared reviews and ratings

Colleen | 75 or over | Female | On medication for 1 to less than 2 years | Patient
9/22/2023
Condition: Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia
Overall rating 5.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

IgM over 4000 down to 500. Red/White cells almost normal. Joint pain.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Anonymous | 75 or over | Female | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
9/20/2023
Condition: marginal zone lymphoma
Overall rating 4.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

slight improvement in 6 weeks and stable

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Brunkinsa | 65-74 | Female | On medication for 6 months to less than 1 year | Patient
3/8/2023
Condition: Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia
Overall rating 5.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

My IGM count went to a normal level within one month of use. I went from over 2000 to 230. I’ve had Waldenstroms with my counts going over 9000 and this has been the quickest turn around with no side effects.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Barbara | 65-74 | Female | On medication for 1 to 6 months | Patient
12/10/2021
Condition: Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia
Overall rating 1.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

Disabiling

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON WEBMD

The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions.

Read More