March 12, 2008 -- The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has toughened its smog regulations by lowering the allowable level of ozone in the air. But some health groups say the new standards aren't strict enough to protect the public's health.
The agency lowered the legally acceptable level of ozone, the main component of smog, from 0.084 to 0.075 parts per million (ppm). That would mean that counties nationwide with higher ozone levels per eight-hour period would be required to take cleanup steps.
Ozone is formed when emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds (mainly from power plants and car tailpipes) are exposed to sunlight and heat. It can cause lung irritation and worsen human lung diseases, including asthma and emphysema. Ozone pollution is generally worse during warm summer months, when the majority of poor air-quality days occur.
Scientists Urge Stricter Standard
Health and environmental groups have lobbied for years for a stricter ozone standard. EPA Administrator Steven Johnson said Wednesday that lowering allowable ozone to 0.075 ppm would protect the public health and was "based on the science."
"I concluded that 0.075 was health protective," Johnson told reporters in a conference call Wednesday.
In 2006, the EPA's Clean Air Science Advisory Committee (CASAC) concluded a significantly lower ozone level was needed to prevent ill health effects.
"The primary 8-hr (standard) needs to be substantially reduced to protect human health, particularly in sensitive subpopulations. Therefore, the CASAC unanimously recommends a range of 0.060 to 0.070 ppm for the primary ozone (standard)," the panel concluded in an October 2006 report.
Johnson said he had tightened ozone standards in accordance with the Clean Air Act, the 38-year-old law that gave rise to ozone regulation. He said lower standards would not be practical and may not even be achievable in some cities. Johnson pointed to 85 counties that he said have not yet met 1996 ozone standards.
"Bottom line -- I adhered to the law and I certainly also considered the most recent scientific evidence in making the decision," he said.
Counties don't have to start meeting the standard until 2013.
Some health groups say the new standards don't go far enough.
American Lung Association President Bernadette Toomey calls the EPA's decision a "critical tightening" of ozone standards.
"We wish we could be happier about this decision, but we cannot. The standard announced today, although an improvement, falls far short of the requirements of the Clean Air Act. We are unable to celebrate half measures when the risks are so evident, when the science and the scientists are so united about what is needed and when the missed opportunity means that thousands will suffer more and die sooner than they should," Toomey says in a statement.
Business groups criticized the EPA for lowering standards too much.
A statement from the National Association of Manufacturers notes that ozone levels have dropped about 20% nationwide since 1980. "The current standard continues to protect human health. The EPA should focus on helping communities meet the current standard before imposing new, untested standards," the statement says.
The decision was also attacked by Democrats on Capitol Hill. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, criticized the Bush administration for going against the recommendations of its scientific advisory board.
"EPA's mission is to protect human health and the environment, but the Administrator seems to be more interested in protecting special interests than children and families," she says in a statement.