Skip to content

Breast Cancer Health Center

Font Size

Description of Evidence


    The evidence from randomized trials should be put into context with the evidence from observational studies that suggests that there is an increased risk of developing breast cancer associated with estrogen-only postmenopausal HT. The Million Women Study [40] observed no increased risk of breast cancer among women whose first use of estrogen-only therapy was 5 or more years after menopause, but the risk was statistically significantly higher among women initiating therapy within 5 years of menopause (RR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.36–1.49). Among that group, the risk increased with duration of hormone use. Overall, risks associated with estrogen-only HT were lower than those observed for combined estrogen-progestin HT.[40] Estrogen-only therapy, even for more than 25 years duration, was not associated with invasive breast cancer in a case-control study of women aged 65 years and older.[41] The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, a reanalysis of data from 52 observational studies of HT and breast cancer, had information on specific hormonal preparations for 39% of eligible women and most of these women reported use of estrogen-alone preparations.[32] The combined analysis showed no marked variation between estrogen-only preparations and combined HT.[32] However, the collaborative analysis, overall, provided limited information on estrogen-only versus combination estrogen-progestin therapy. Factors that may explain the disparate findings of the association between estrogen-only use and the risk of developing breast cancer, which were observed in the clinical trial and observational studies, include an imbalance in the prevalence of routine screening between users and nonusers of hormones, and gap time between the onset of menopause and the first use of postmenopausal hormone therapy.[42,43]

    Following publication of the WHI results, HT use dropped dramatically in the United States and elsewhere. Follow-up of participants on the combined HT arm demonstrated a rapid decrease in the elevated breast cancer risk of therapy within 2 years, despite similar rates of mammography screening.[44] Analysis of changes in breast cancer rates in the United States observed a sharp decline in breast cancer incidence rates from 2002 to 2003, following the release of the WHI trial data among women aged 50 years and older.[45,46] The decreased incidence is primarily the result of changes in the incidence of ER–positive breast cancer [45], which provides additional support for the causal association between combined HT and the risk of breast cancer. Similarly, in multiple countries where the prevalence of HT use was high, breast cancer rates decreased in a similar time frame, coincident with changes in prescribing patterns and/or reported prevalence of use. [47,48,49] A study among women receiving regular mammography screening supports that the observed sharp decline from 2002 to 2003 in breast cancer incidence was primarily caused by withdrawal of HT rather than declines in mammography rates.[50] Since the decline in breast cancer incidence noted from 2002 to 2003, rates in the United States have stabilized.[50,51] These observations support the causal effect of combined HT on breast cancer incidence and modification of breast cancer risk through either withdrawal of HT or never having used HT.


    Today on WebMD

    Breast Cancer Overview
    From self-exams and biopsies to reconstruction, we’ve got you covered.
    Dealing with breast cancer
    Get answers to your questions.
    woman having mammogram
    Experts don’t agree on all fronts, but you can be your own advocate.
    woman undergoing breast cancer test
    Many women worry. But the truth? Most abnormalities aren’t breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Treatments Improving
    Resolved To Quit Smoking
    Woman getting mammogram
    Screening Tests for Women
    ovarian cancer overview slideshow
    serious woman
    what is your cancer risk
    10 Ways to Revitalize Slideshow