Commercial Baby Foods Fall Short for Nutrition: Study
Most are too sweet and are advertised for infants who'd be better off with breast milk, experts say
By Robert Preidt
MONDAY, Sept. 9 (HealthDay News) -- Commercial baby foods don't meet infants' dietary needs when they are weaning, according to a new study.
That's because commercial foods are predominately sweet foods that provide little extra nutritional benefit over breast or formula milk, the researchers said. They also said commercial baby foods are marketed for use in infants beginning at the age of 4 months, an age when they should still be breast-fed only.
"The most commonly used commercial foods considered in this study supply no more energy than breast or formula milk and yet they are promoted at an age when they will replace the breast or formula milk, which is all that babies under six months really need," explained a team led by Dr. Charlotte Wright, of the University of Glasgow in Scotland.
One expert in the United States said the study brings up important issues.
"Weaning from milk-based diets to food-based diets in this age range should not be taken lightly," said Dr. Peter Richel, chief of the department of pediatrics at Northern Westchester Hospital in Mount Kisco, N.Y. "We must provide adequate nutrition to provide energy, consistent growth velocity and age-appropriate milestones in all areas of development," he said.
In the new study, Wright's team analyzed the nutritional content of all baby foods in the United Kingdom that can be used during weaning, a time when infants are introduced to a wider range of food textures and flavors in order to encourage them to try different foods and boost their energy and nutrient intake.
The 462 products included ready-made soft, wet foods; powdered meals that are reconstituted with milk or water; breakfast cereals; and finger foods, such as rusks.
The researchers found that 79 percent of the products were ready-made spoonable foods, 44 percent of which were marketed for infants aged 4 months and older.
The energy content of the spoonable foods was almost identical to that of breast milk and their protein content was only 40 percent higher than formula milk, according to the study, which was published online in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood.