Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Weight Loss & Diet Plans

Font Size

Study Shows Between-Meal Snacking Doesn't Reduce Eating at Mealtime

By
WebMD Health News

Nov. 15, 1999 (Atlanta) -- Before you reach for that between-meal snack, consider this: a new study suggests that snacking will not only do nothing to curb the amount of food you'll eventually eat at the next meal, it could even contain the most fattening calories of the day.

French researchers came to this conclusion after studying the body's response to additional food intake in the interval between a decent-sized lunch and a buffet dinner. Eleven lean, young men participated in the study, which took place in four sessions over two weeks' time.

The first session was devoted to finding out how much the men ate of a given lunch, as well as how soon afterwards -- unprompted by a clock -- they were hungry enough to ask for dinner. During this interval, the researchers took frequent measurements of blood glucose and insulin concentrations to get a biological picture of how the men's bodies usually reacted to food intake and hunger.

During the next three sessions, the men ate identical lunches. The difference was, the researchers introduced a snack between lunch and dinner and the men had to eat it, regardless whether they were hungry.

To test for hunger during the lunch-to-dinner interval, the men were asked to report frequently whether they felt satisfied. And to make sure it was actually hunger and not habit, the men were kept in isolation during the sessions -- so that they had no idea how much time had elapsed since lunch nor whether it was 'time' for dinner. The subjects asked for dinner at about the same time regardless of whether or not they had a snack.

The study results raise questions about snacking's impact on weight gain. But dieticians contacted by WebMD had some problems with the study's methods. Jackie Berning, PhD, RD, an associate professor of nutrition at the University of Colorado in Colorado Springs, zeroed in on the study's finding of no big change in blood glucose levels in the men, despite their having consumed a snack. "Storage, to me, is the big question. ... The assumption I got [from the study] is that [snacking] tends to favor storage, which would tend to favor fat. But they don't know that. Maybe [the extra glucose] is going to the brain. Maybe [the subjects] were reading a hard book. Maybe it's going to the liver or muscles. If they're twitching their foot maybe it's going there."

A recent poster presented at the American Dietetic Association's annual meeting by researchers from the University of Memphis concluded that timing of food intake is unimportant when it comes to putting on weight. "Some say timing has an effect on fat storage and body weight. We found it does not," says Linda Clemens, EdD, RD, a professor at the school. Clemens questioned the "artificial environment" in which the study was conducted, as well as its small size, but calls the results interesting.

Today on WebMD

vegetables
Video
Woman trying clothes / dress
Assessment
 
Woman looking at reflection in mirror
Article
Hot cup of coffee
Quiz
 
woman shopping fresh produce
Video
butter curl on knife
Quiz
 
eating out healthy
Article
Smiling woman, red hair
Article
 
6-Week Challenges
Want to know more?
Chill Out and Charge Up Challenge – How to help your tribe de-stress and energize.
Spark Change Challenge - Ready for a healthy change? Get some major motivation.
I have read and agreed to WebMD's Privacy Policy.
Enter cell phone number
- -
Entering your cell phone number and pressing submit indicates you agree to receive text messages from WebMD related to this challenge. WebMD is utilizing a 3rd party vendor, CellTrust, to provide the messages. You can opt out at any time.
Standard text rates apply
thumbnail_woman_tossing_spinach
Video
lunchbox
Article
 
What Girls Need To Know About Eating Disorders
Article
teen squeezing into jeans
fitfor Teens
 

Special Sections