IVF Risks Mostly Due to Multiple Births
Single-Embryo Transfer May Cut Risk of in Vitro Fertilization
Single-Embryo Transfer: Answer to IVF Risk? continued...
Sutcliffe says that European doctors achieve nearly the same success rate
with single-embryo transfers as with multiple-embryo transfers. Given the
vastly reduced risk of multiple births, he suggests that U.S. doctors should
look to Europe for guidance.
"My research, and that of many others in the field, suggests that if IVF
babies are not born prematurely, they really have virtually the same prospects
as a naturally conceived child," Sutcliffe says. "Especially in the
U.S., the main risk is due to the fact that people are putting in too many
embryos. As a result, you can have twins, triplets, quadruplets, or more and
expose yourself and your babies to the risk of premature birth."
"Definitely single-embryo transfer is much better," Reddy says.
"The problem is that for older women, you have to balance out the cost and
the number of procedures. For a woman over 40, it is gong to take many more
cycles. But we in the U.S. are trying to increase the amount of single-embryo
transfers and decrease the number of multiple-embryo transfers."
Indeed, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine's June 2006
guidelines suggest that doctors transfer only a single embryo for women under
age 35 with good prospects for success. For women under age 38, they recommend
transfer of no more than two embryos. But for older women or women with poorer
prospects for successful pregnancy, the ASRM leaves the door open for transfer
of up to five embryos.
Attia says his institution does not transfer more than two embryos per
procedure. He and Reddy each note that twin births do not appear to be as risky
as higher-multiple births. Both join Sutcliffe in calling for more