Are Periods Just an 'Option' for Those on the Pill?
Experts Argue the Merits of Ending Monthly Ritual
WebMD News Archive
"There are some women who like the monthly reminder that they are not
pregnant and that their pills are working," Ellertson says. "But with
modern pills, the failure rates are so low that more women are inclined to
trust these methods. Plus, women have access to cheap and effective pregnancy
tests" for added reassurance.
While it is probably not unsafe to suppress one's period for a few months at
a time, today's oral contraceptive pills weren't designed for this purpose,
counters Donna Shoupe, MD, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the
University of Southern California. Shoupe, who reviewed the Lancet
article for WebMD, also disputes Ellertson's contention that monthly periods
aren't medically necessary.
"It is a very delicate balance between having enough estrogen for the
rest of the body and not stimulating the lining" of the uterus to thicken.
"[If] it builds up and you don't slough it off, you can get cancer,"
Shoupe says modern birth control pills are extremely useful in solving many
of the problems associated with menstrual cycles, including PMS symptoms,
cramping, and heavy bleeding. In her practice, fully 50% of her patients are
taking oral contraceptives for some goal other than contraception. For
most women on the pill, getting their period "really isn't that bad,"
- An expert on reproductive health has written an essay questioning the role
of menstruation in women's health and whether birth control should be used to
stop it altogether.
- She offers up as evidence that there are no health benefits to having a
monthly period and there are no reasons to assume this is "natural" or
- One critic argues that using contraception to prevent menstruation could
stimulate the lining of the uterus to thicken and cause cancer, and she adds
that for most women on birth control pills, monthly menstruation isn't all that