Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Fitness & Exercise

Font Size

Are Full-Face Shields Making Ice Hockey a More Dangerous Sport?

WebMD Health News

Dec. 21, 1999 (Atlanta) -- In the fast, aggressive sport of ice hockey, the number of high-impact collisions has led many colleges to make full-face masks mandatory. However, the nearly simultaneous increase in concussions and neck injuries has sparked a debate. Are the masks creating a 'gladiator mentality' that puts athletes at risk?

In a study published in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association, a group of sports medicine specialists tracked several hundred players' injuries over one season and found that full-face shields have not increased the risk of neck injuries. In fact, they had the added benefit of significantly reducing the risk of facial and dental injuries.

There was no evidence of 'gladiator mentality,' study author Willem H. Meeuwisse, MD, PhD, of the University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, tells WebMD in an interview. "We looked at whether overall injury rates were different and they were not. We saw the same amount of aggressive behavior and other injuries [whether they were wearing full or partial shields]."

The study involved 642 male ice hockey players in 22 different teams, all of whom were about 22 years old and playing in the 1997-1998 Canadian Inter-University Athletics Union hockey season. About half the athletes wore full-face shields during the play season, while the other half wore half-face shields.

Of the 319 athletes who wore full-face shields, 195 had at least one injury during the season, while of the 323 who wore half-face shields, 204 were injured.

"Although we found a significant difference in rates of head and facial injuries between the two groups, there was no significant difference in risk of sustaining a concussion, neck, or other injury (overall) for athletes wearing half shields compared with those wearing full-face shields," says Meeuwisse. "Basically, we showed that full-face shields are a good idea and don't have any measurable downside."

The study also found that, for those wearing the half-shield, the risk of facial laceration was nearly 2.5 times greater than with full shields. The risk of dental injury was 10 times higher with half-shields. Time lost from participation because of concussion was significantly greater in those who wore half-shield protection.

While half-shield players were at greater risk of facial lacerations, Meeuwisse points out, those with the full-face shield had lacerations, too -- but they tended to be 'burst' or crush-type injuries at the chin. "With the half-shield, the lacerations tended to be around the mouth and the eye and were potentially a lot more serious."

The number of concussions was not significant, says Meeuwisse, but the severity was worse in players with half-shields. "We didn't look at specifically why, but with the full-face shield, the helmet is actually anchored on the head by the shield because it cups the chin. With the half-shield, it can slip back and expose the forehead."

Healthy Living Tools

Ditch Those Inches

Set goals, tally calorie intake, track workouts and more, all via WebMD’s free Food & Fitness Planner.

Get Started

Today on WebMD

Wet feet on shower floor tile
Flat Abs
Build a Better Butt Slideshow
woman using ice pack

man exercising
7 most effective exercises
Man looking at watch before workout
Overweight man sitting on park bench

pilates instructor
jogger running among flowering plants
woman walking
Taylor Lautner