Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up

Metabolic Syndrome Health Center

Font Size

Fresh Take on Fructose vs. Glucose

Study Shows More Insulin Resistance With Fructose-Sweetened Beverages
By
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

April 21, 2009 -- New research shows big differences in how the sugars fructose and glucose are metabolized by the body. But the findings have little relevance to the current debate about whether high-fructose corn syrup is a bigger dietary villain than other sugars added to processed foods, experts say.

Overweight study participants showed more evidence of insulin resistance and other risk factors for heart disease and diabetes when 25% of their calories came from fructose-sweetened beverages compared to glucose-sweetened beverages.

Both groups gained weight during the 10-week study, but the fructose group gained more of the dangerous belly fat that has been linked to a higher risk for heart attack and stroke.

The study showed clear differences in how fructose and glucose are metabolized by the body, nutrition researcher and principal investigator Peter J. Havel, PhD, of the University of California at Davis tells WebMD.

But the findings do not show that high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), used in everything from soft drinks to cereals in the U.S., is worse for your health than other added sugars.

That's because despite the name, high-fructose corn syrup is chemically similar to other widely used sweeteners, including table sugar (sucrose), honey, and even sweeteners made from concentrated fruit juices.

All contain glucose and fructose in roughly equal amounts. The high-fructose corn syrup used in most soft drinks and other sweetened beverages in the U.S. contains about 55% fructose and 45% glucose, compared to the 50/50 fructose-glucose ratio found in table sugar.

"Any added sugar used as an alternative to high-fructose corn syrup would have a similar chemical composition," University of Cincinnati obesity researcher Matthias H. Tschop, MD, tells WebMD. "While it is possible that there are differences in how these sugars affect metabolic pathways, I know of no studies that show this."

But Tschop says the newly reported study is an important step forward in understanding the metabolic impact of glucose and fructose, even if the real-world public health implications are less clear.

Fructose and Glucose Study

The study included 32 overweight or obese men and women whose average age was 50.

Over a 10-week period, the men and women drank either glucose- or fructose-sweetened beverages, totaling 25% of their daily calorie intake, either in an outpatient setting (eight weeks long) or highly controlled inpatient setting (two weeks long).

Both the groups gained weight during the trial, but imaging studies revealed that most of the added fat in the fructose group occurred in the belly, while most of the fat gained by the glucose group was subcutaneous (under the skin).

Belly fat, but not subcutaneous fat, has been linked to an increased risk for heart disease and diabetes.

The fructose group had higher total cholesterol and LDL "bad" cholesterol, plus greater insulin resistance, which are consistent with metabolic syndrome, while the glucose group did not.

The research appears in the latest issue of the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Today on WebMD

Cholesterol Confusion
Health Check
Metabolic Syndrome Boosts Other Health Risks
Video
 
Inside A Heart Attack
Slideshow
How You Can Control Blood Sugar and Manage Insulin
Slideshow
 
Heart Foods Slideshow
Slideshow
Resolved To Quit Smoking
Slideshow
 
Stroke Risk
QUIZ
Lowering Blood Pressure Slideshow
SLIDESHOW
 
Salt Shockers
Slideshow
Cholesterol Fact or Fiction
Quiz
 
Metabolic Syndrome 11 Things You Should Know
FAQ
Omega 3 Overview Slideshow
Slideshow
 

WebMD Special Sections