Overview
continued...
Magnitude of Effect: The estimated average excess risk of upper gastrointestinal complications in average-risk people attributable to NSAIDs is 4/1,000 to 5/1,000 people per year. The excess risk varies with the underlying gastrointestinal risk, however, it likely exceeds ten extra cases per 1,000 people per year in more than 10% of users. Serious cardiovascular events are increased by 50% to 60%.
| Study Design: Evidence obtained from RCTs and high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses.[13,14] |
| Internal Validity: Good. |
| Consistency: Good. |
| External Validity: Good. |
Benefits
Based on solid evidence, daily aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) for at least 5 years reduces CRC incidence and mortality. This is based on two reports of extended follow-up of two RCTs [16,17] and meta-analysis of observational studies.[16] A third report that adds extended follow-up of an additional two RCTs (with a meta-analysis of all four RCTs) adds certainty to this conclusion.[18]
Magnitude of Effect: After 23 years of follow-up, incidence of CRC in the placebo group was 3.8% and in the ASA group 2.5% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85). In the report from all four RCTs, the 20-year risk of death due to CRC in trials that allocated ASA for at least 5 years was reduced by about 40% (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.81), absolute risk reduction was from about 3.1% to 1.9%. The primary effect was on mortality from proximal colon cancer.
| Study Design: Extended follow-up of four RCTs. |
| Internal Validity: Fair, some data from registries and death certificates, some loss to follow-up; variation in ASA dose; adherence to ASA unknown after end of trials (5-9 years). |
| Consistency: Consistent. |
| External Validity: Fair, most data from British men; fewer data from women. |
Harms
Based on solid evidence, harms of ASA use include excessive bleeding, including gastrointestinal bleeds and hemorrhagic stroke.
Magnitude of Effect: The estimated average excess risk of upper gastrointestinal complications is 10 to 30 per 1,000 people for a period of 10 years, on the higher end for men and on the lower end for women. Risk increases with age.
| Study Design: Evidence obtained from large databases.[15,20] |
| Internal Validity: Good. |
| Consistency: Good. |
| External Validity: Good, data from national databases. |
Postmenopausal hormones
Benefits
Based on solid evidence, postmenopausal estrogen plus progesterone hormone use, but not estrogen alone, decreases the incidence of CRC.[21]
Magnitude of Effect: In the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), there was a 44% reduction in CRC incidence in the estrogen and progesterone group but not in the estrogen-only group. The absolute reduction in the incidence of CRC was 0.6 cancers per 1,000 women, from 1.6 cancers per 1,000 women to 1.0 cancer per 1,000 women. A meta-analysis of 18 observational studies showed a 20% reduction in colon cancer incidence among women who had ever used hormone therapy (RR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.86) compared with nonusers and a 34% reduction among current users (RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.74).
| Study Design: Evidence obtained from a RCT and meta-analysis of 18 observational studies. |
| Internal Validity: Good. |
| Consistency: Good. |
| External Validity: Good. |
WebMD Public Information from the National Cancer Institute
